Liew Zheng Yang v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Attempted Drug Possession

Liew Zheng Yang appealed against his conviction. Steven Chong JA allowed the appeal in part, reducing the charges to attempted possession of cannabis. The court sentenced Liew to 20 months' imprisonment for each of the Attempted Possession Charges, to run consecutively with the 6-month sentence for the Consumption Charge, for a global sentence of 26 months' imprisonment. The court considered the quantity of drugs and the offender's personal circumstances.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Sentenced to 20 months' imprisonment for each of the Attempted Possession Charges, to run consecutively with the 6-month sentence for the Consumption Charge, for a global sentence of 26 months' imprisonment.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex Tempore Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding sentencing for attempted drug possession. The court considered the quantity of drugs and the offender's personal circumstances.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyOtherOther
John Lu of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Rimplejit Kaur of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Liew Zheng YangAppellantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Steven ChongJudge of AppealYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
John LuAttorney-General’s Chambers
Rimplejit KaurAttorney-General’s Chambers
Eugene Singarajah ThuraisingamEugene Thuraisingam LLP
Genevieve PangEugene Thuraisingam LLP

4. Facts

  1. Liew was initially convicted of abetting in a conspiracy to traffic controlled drugs.
  2. The conviction was reduced to two charges of attempted possession of cannabis and cannabis mixture.
  3. The drugs in question were 34.53 grams of cannabis and 68.21 grams of cannabis mixture.
  4. Liew also pleaded guilty to one charge of consumption of a cannabinol derivative.
  5. Liew testified that the drugs were for his own consumption.
  6. Liew was 22 years old at the time of the offence.
  7. Liew sought treatment with a psychiatrist and has been drug-free for three years.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Liew Zheng Yang v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate’s Appeal No 9253 of 2016, [2017] SGHC 257
  2. Liew Zheng Yang v Public Prosecutor, , [2017] SGHC 157

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Judgment delivered
Criminal Motion No 32 of 2017 dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Appropriate sentence for attempted drug possession
    • Outcome: The court sentenced Liew to 20 months' imprisonment for each of the Attempted Possession Charges, to run consecutively with the 6-month sentence for the Consumption Charge, for a global sentence of 26 months' imprisonment.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] SGHC 157
      • [2015] 5 SLR 122
      • [2016] SGDC 278
      • [2017] 2 SLR 449
      • [2016] 3 SLR 269
      • [2005] 3 SLR(R) 1
      • [2017] SGHC 183
      • [2017] SGDC 70

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against conviction
  2. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Attempted possession of controlled drugs
  • Consumption of a cannabinol derivative

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Liew Zheng Yang v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 157SingaporeThe judgment in which the appellant's conviction was reduced to attempted possession.
Vasentha d/o Joseph v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2015] 5 SLR 122SingaporeCited for the sentencing approach for drug trafficking offences.
Public Prosecutor v Jumahat Bin JaparDistrict CourtYes[2016] SGDC 278SingaporeCited as a precedent for indicative starting points in drug possession cases, but distinguished by the court.
Ng Kean Meng Terence v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 449SingaporeDiscussed the suitability of the 'multiple starting points' approach in sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v Tan Thian EarnHigh CourtYes[2016] 3 SLR 269SingaporeCited for declining to adopt a 'multiple starting points' approach for offences under s 10A(1) of the MDA.
Dinesh Singh Bhatia s/o Amarjeet Singh v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2005] 3 SLR(R) 1SingaporeEstablished a sentencing range for first-time drug consumption offenders.
Public Prosecutor v Lim Cheng Ji AlvinHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 183SingaporeApplied the sentencing range and factors identified in Dinesh Singh in the context of drug possession.
Public Prosecutor v Ang Wei Hsiung KennethDistrict CourtYes[2017] SGDC 70SingaporeCompared to the present case due to similar charges and quantities of drugs involved.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 5(2)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 12Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 107(b)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act ss 8(a)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 8(b)(ii)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 307(1)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Attempted possession
  • Cannabis
  • Cannabis mixture
  • Sentencing framework
  • Drug consumption
  • Mitigating factors
  • Aggravating factors

15.2 Keywords

  • drug possession
  • cannabis
  • sentencing
  • criminal law
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Offences
  • Sentencing