S K Kumar

S K Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 36 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and sexual offences. Their track record shows a 19.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S K Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 77 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	28 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	21 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	11 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Immigration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marriage of Convenience	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal References	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Secret Profits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Separation of Powers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Gaming House Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Transport Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
One transaction rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Totality principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proportionality principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
State Entrapment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equal Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agent Provocateur	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Heart Attack	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malingering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Workers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unnatural Sex	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Permits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Principle of Parity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housebreaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S K Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S K Kumar has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
S K Kumar Law Practice LLP	15 cases	42% of cases	Huang Liping v Public Prosecutor: Marriage of Convenience & Criminal Reference(Jul 2016) Mohamad Fairuuz v PP: Moneylenders Act & Probation Eligibility(Dec 2014) Mehra Radhika v Public Prosecutor: Marriage of Convenience & Immigration Advantage(Oct 2014)
S K Kumar & Associates	14 cases	39% of cases	Choi Byeongkuk v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession - Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2011) Lim Boon Keong v Public Prosecutor: Norketamine Consumption & Drug Law Compliance(Jun 2010) Balbir Singh v PP: Assault on Public Transport Worker & Sentencing Principles(Apr 2010)
S K Kumar and Associates	4 cases	11% of cases	Saldur Rahman v Mayban General Assurance: Workman's Compensation & Civil Suit Conflict(May 2005) PP v DU: Unnatural Offence & Outraging Modesty - Alibi Defence, Sufficiency of Charge Particulars(Oct 2004) Rajendran v Drill-Quip: Assessment of Damages for Work Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity(May 2004)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Netto Michael George: Housebreaking, Rape, Unnatural Sex, Outraging Modesty, and Armed Robbery(Nov 2000)
M/s S K Kumar Law Practice LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Mohammad Faizal v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Drug Penalties under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2013)
S Kumar Law Practice LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v PP: Unlicensed Moneylending, Repeat Offender Penalties(Jan 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S K Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	222.2 parties avg	2.2	61%
Partial	62.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Unknown	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Won	72.3 parties avg	2.3	19%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	52.3 parties avg	2.3
2014	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S K Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	22(61%)	61%
Partial	6(17%)	17%
Unknown	1(3%)	3%
Won	7(19%)	19%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	143,360.00	47,786.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	5 221	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2013	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2014	5 2111	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 36 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Huang Liping v Public Prosecutor: Marriage of Convenience & Criminal Reference 12 Jul 2016 Huang Liping (Applicant)Lost	12 Jul 2016	Huang Liping (Applicant): Leave to refer questions to the Court of Appeal deniedThe application for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal was denied.
2	Mohamad Fairuuz v PP: Moneylenders Act & Probation Eligibility 21 Dec 2014 Mohamad Fairuuz bin Saleh (Appellant)Partial	21 Dec 2014	Mohamad Fairuuz bin Saleh (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with the term of imprisonment reduced from three months to six weeks. The fine was not disturbed.
3	Mehra Radhika v Public Prosecutor: Marriage of Convenience & Immigration Advantage 27 Oct 2014 Mehra Radhika (Appellant)Won	27 Oct 2014	Mehra Radhika (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and the sentence of imprisonment was reduced from eight months to six months.
4	Public Prosecutor v Leng Kah Poh: Interpretation of s 6(a) Prevention of Corruption Act 16 Oct 2014 Leng Kah Poh (Respondent)	16 Oct 2014	Leng Kah Poh (Respondent): -
5	Tan Kian Tiong v PP: Mobile Phone Use While Driving & Disqualification Order Appeal 30 Jul 2014 Tan Kian Tiong (Appellant)Lost	30 Jul 2014	Tan Kian Tiong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the disqualification order was dismissed.
6	Choo Kok Hwee v PP: Enhanced Sentencing for Second DUI Offence under Road Traffic Act 29 Jun 2014 Choo Kok Hwee (Appellant)Lost	29 Jun 2014	Choo Kok Hwee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the sentence imposed by the District Judge was dismissed.
7	Public Prosecutor v BMD: Rape and Sexual Assault of Vulnerable Victim 05 Nov 2013 BMD (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2013	BMD (Defendant): Accused found guiltyAccused was found guilty on all six charges and sentenced to imprisonment and caning.
8	Leng Kah Poh v PP: Corruption Charges & F&B Contracts at IKEA Singapore 17 Sep 2013 Leng Kah Poh (Appellant)Won	17 Sep 2013	Leng Kah Poh (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the appellant was acquitted of the charges under appeal.
9	Koh Swee Beng v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Trafficking & Consumption Sentence 16 Jul 2013 Koh Swee Beng (Appellant)Lost	16 Jul 2013	Koh Swee Beng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentence dismissed.
10	Public Prosecutor v Shaik Alaudeen: Criminal Revision for Amendment of Drug Consumption Charge 20 Feb 2013 Shaik Alaudeen s/o Hasan Bashar (Respondent)Won	20 Feb 2013	Shaik Alaudeen s/o Hasan Bashar (Respondent): Petition dismissedThe court dismissed the Public Prosecutor's petition to amend the charge against him.
11	Mohammad Faizal v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Drug Penalties under Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Jan 2013 Amazi bin Hawasi (Applicant)Lost	10 Jan 2013	Amazi bin Hawasi (Applicant): Motion DismissedCriminal motion for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
12	Mohd Hazwan v PP: Immigration Act - Engaging in Business of Conveying Prohibited Immigrant 09 Oct 2012 Mohd Hazwan bin Mohd Muji (Appellant)Partial	09 Oct 2012	Mohd Hazwan bin Mohd Muji (Appellant): Conviction under s 57(1)(c) of the Immigration Act amended to s 57(1)(b)The initial charge under s 57(1)(c) of the Immigration Act was amended to s 57(1)(b) of the same Act. The appellant was sentenced to 10 months' imprisonment.
13	Mohammad Faizal v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Drug Penalties 09 Aug 2012 Mohammad Faizal bin Sabtu (Petitioner)Lost	09 Aug 2012	Mohammad Faizal bin Sabtu (Petitioner): Stated Question answered in the negativeThe court found the law constitutional and within the powers of the Legislature.
14	Amazi bin Hawasi v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of s 33A(5)(a) of Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Aug 2012 Amazi bin Hawasi (Petitioner)Lost	09 Aug 2012	Amazi bin Hawasi (Petitioner): Question answered in the negativeThe court determined that section 33A(5)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act does not violate the principle of separation of powers.
15	Md Rabiul Alom Harun Or Rasid v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction Under Common Gaming House Act 31 Jul 2012 Md Rabiul Alom Harun Or Rasid (Appellant)Won	31 Jul 2012	Md Rabiul Alom Harun Or Rasid (Appellant): Appeal AllowedConviction set aside and case remitted to the District Court for plea to be re-taken.
16	Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v PP: Unlicensed Moneylending, Repeat Offender Penalties 29 Jan 2012 Ho Sheng Yu Garreth (Appellant)Partial	29 Jan 2012	Ho Sheng Yu Garreth (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partFines and caning reduced; imprisonment term undisturbed.
17	Mohammad Ashik v PP: Statutory Interpretation of Misuse of Drugs Act & Admissibility of Evidence 06 Sep 2011 Mohammad Ashik bin Aris (Appellant)Lost	06 Sep 2011	Mohammad Ashik bin Aris (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug consumption was dismissed.
18	Choi Byeongkuk v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession - Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Jan 2011 Choi Byeongkuk (Appellant)Lost	10 Jan 2011	Choi Byeongkuk (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against 8 months’ imprisonment sentence dismissed.
19	Lim Boon Keong v Public Prosecutor: Norketamine Consumption & Drug Law Compliance 22 Jun 2010 Lim Boon Keong (Appellant)Won	22 Jun 2010	Lim Boon Keong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appellant's conviction under s 8(b)(i) of the Misuse of Drugs Act was set aside.
20	Balbir Singh v PP: Assault on Public Transport Worker & Sentencing Principles 21 Apr 2010 Balbir Singh s/o Amar Singh (Appellant)Lost	21 Apr 2010	Balbir Singh s/o Amar Singh (Appellant): Appeal DismissedBalbir Singh's appeal against his four-week imprisonment sentence was dismissed.
21	Rangasamy Subramaniam v PP: Drink Driving Offence Analysis under Road Traffic Act 12 Nov 2009 Rangasamy Subramaniam (Appellant)Partial	12 Nov 2009	Rangasamy Subramaniam (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartConviction under section 67(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act quashed; court to hear counsel on whether to convict under section 68(1)(b).
22	Public Prosecutor v Gansean: Rape Conviction Upheld on Appeal 07 Jul 2009 Gansean s/o Rengasamy (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	07 Jul 2009	Gansean s/o Rengasamy (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's appeal against his conviction was dismissed. He was convicted on the charge of rape under s 376(1) of the Penal Code.
23	Jeffery bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Principles, Parity, and Drug Offences 23 Mar 2009 Jeffery bin Abdullah (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2009	Jeffery bin Abdullah (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the sentences imposed on him by the district judge was dismissed.
24	Mohamed Emran v PP: Drug Trafficking, State Entrapment & Constitutional Rights 26 Jun 2008 Mohamed Emran bin Mohamed Ali (Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2008	Mohamed Emran bin Mohamed Ali (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed.
25	Johari bin Kanadi v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Punishment for Subutex Consumption under Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Apr 2008 Bahtiar bin Mohd Rahim (Appellant)Lost	24 Apr 2008	Bahtiar bin Mohd Rahim (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentence dismissed; original sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment and 3 strokes of the cane upheld.
26	PP v Mohamad Norhazri: Gang Robbery & Abetment of Rape Sentencing 17 Jan 2008 Mohamad Norhazri bin Mohd Faudzi (Defendant)Lost	17 Jan 2008	Mohamad Norhazri bin Mohd Faudzi (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedSentenced to 14 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane for robbery offences.
27	Aw Bock Eng v Public Prosecutor: Road Traffic Act, Public Service Vehicle, and Insurance Policy 23 Aug 2007 Aw Bock Eng (Appellant)Lost	23 Aug 2007	Aw Bock Eng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
28	Lee Kuan Tat v PP: Unlicensed Moneylending Appeal - Default Sentence & Disparity 13 May 2007 Lee Kuan Tat (Appellant)Lost	13 May 2007	Lee Kuan Tat (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
29	NTUC Income v Next of Kin of Narayasamy: Workmen's Compensation for Heart Attack Suffered During Employment 12 Sep 2006 Next of kin of Narayasamy s/o Ramasamy, deceased (Respondent)Won	12 Sep 2006	Next of kin of Narayasamy s/o Ramasamy, deceased (Respondent): Compensation Award UpheldThe respondent was entitled to be compensated under the Act. The compensation payable was fixed at $87,360. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
30	Abul Khabir Uddin Tohron Nisa v Public Prosecutor: Bail Reduction Application under Employment of Foreign Workers Act 30 Mar 2006 Abul Khabir Uddin Tohron Nisa (Applicant)Partial	30 Mar 2006	Abul Khabir Uddin Tohron Nisa (Applicant): Bail ReducedBail reduced from $100,000 to $50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
31	Saldur Rahman v Mayban General Assurance: Workman's Compensation & Civil Suit Conflict 10 May 2005 Saldur Rahman (Applicant)Won	10 May 2005	Saldur Rahman (Applicant): Application AllowedThe court allowed the application, finding that the compensation claim was not affected by the common law action.
32	PP v DU: Unnatural Offence & Outraging Modesty - Alibi Defence, Sufficiency of Charge Particulars 24 Oct 2004 DU (Defendant)Lost	24 Oct 2004	DU (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was sentenced to five and a half years’ imprisonment on the first charge under s 377 Penal Code and six years’ imprisonment with six strokes of the cane on the second charge under s 354A(2)(b) Penal Code. The sentences were to run concurrently and from the date of sentencing as the Accused had been out on bail.
33	Rajendran v Drill-Quip: Assessment of Damages for Work Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity 13 May 2004 Rajendran a/l Palany (Appellant)Partial	13 May 2004	Rajendran a/l Palany (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; $6,000 awarded for future medication (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	Mustaza Bin Abdul Majid v Public Prosecutor: Theft from Supermarket & Dishonest Intention 03 Feb 2004 Mustaza Bin Abdul Majid (Appellant)Lost	03 Feb 2004	Mustaza Bin Abdul Majid (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
35	Mowvalappil Ussainer v Public Prosecutor: Immigration Act - Employing Immigration Offenders 19 Jul 2001 Mowvalappil Ussainer s/o K Alikunhi (Appellant)Lost	19 Jul 2001	Mowvalappil Ussainer s/o K Alikunhi (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
36	Public Prosecutor v Netto Michael George: Housebreaking, Rape, Unnatural Sex, Outraging Modesty, and Armed Robbery 29 Nov 2000 Netto Michael George (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2000	Netto Michael George (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe Accused was found guilty on all charges.