Samuel Ang Rong En

Samuel Ang Rong En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in res judicata and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Transfer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Family Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trials	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Ang Rong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Samuel Ang Rong En has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fullerton Law Chambers LLC	4 cases	57% of cases	Ari Investment Ltd v Accelera: Res Judicata & Tax Issues in Debt Restructuring(Oct 2024) Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA(May 2024) Ari Investments v Accelera Precious Timber: Res Judicata & Waiver in Debt Restructuring(Oct 2023)
Sureshan LLC	3 cases	43% of cases	WBI v WBJ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(Aug 2022) PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel(Mar 2022) Ong Swee Geok v Gee Ah Eng: Resulting Trusts & HDB Flat Ownership Dispute(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Samuel Ang Rong En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	29%
Partial	34.0 parties avg	4.0	43%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2024	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Samuel Ang Rong En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(13%)	13%
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Partial	3(38%)	38%
Won	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	246,255.00	82,085.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ari Investment Ltd v Accelera: Res Judicata & Tax Issues in Debt Restructuring 07 Oct 2024 Perfect Earth Management Pte. Ltd. (Defendant)Won	07 Oct 2024	Perfect Earth Management Pte. Ltd. (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondents, fixed at $40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA 15 May 2024 Jason Aleksander Kardachi (in his capacity as liquidator of Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) (Applicant)Partial	15 May 2024	Jason Aleksander Kardachi (in his capacity as liquidator of Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) (Applicant): Application Allowed in PartThe Liquidator is granted authorisation to appoint FLC as solicitors for Mingda, effective from the date of the order. The Liquidator is granted authorisation to enter into the Funding Agreement with AMT on the proposed terms.
3	Ari Investments v Accelera Precious Timber: Res Judicata & Waiver in Debt Restructuring 16 Oct 2023 Tan E-Lin, Eileen (Defendant)Won	16 Oct 2023	Tan E-Lin, Eileen (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiffs' claims dismissed.
4	Elcarim Science v Zhang Yongtai: Director's Duties, Share Transfer & Breach of Contract 14 Aug 2023 Dou Suoke (Defendant in counterclaim)Dismissed	14 Aug 2023	Dou Suoke (Defendant in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim against Dou Suoke dismissed except for the unlawful share transfer.
5	WBI v WBJ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 10 Aug 2022 WBI (Appellant)Partial	10 Aug 2022	WBI (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed except for the adjustment of the income ratio for child maintenance.
6	PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel 28 Mar 2022 Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant)Lost	28 Mar 2022	Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe court found that the conduct of the trial counsel was not so wanting as to give rise to a real possibility of a miscarriage of justice, and that no inducement, threat, or promise was made by the investigation officer.
7	Ong Swee Geok v Gee Ah Eng: Resulting Trusts & HDB Flat Ownership Dispute 30 May 2021 Ong Swee Hwa (Applicant)Lost	30 May 2021	Ong Swee Hwa (Applicant): Claim DismissedThe applicant's claim to a beneficial interest in the flat or its sale proceeds was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.