Sandy Baggett

Sandy Baggett is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in prevention of corruption act and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sandy Baggett has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-reliance clause	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Secret Profits	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Separation of Powers	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sandy Baggett has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sandy Baggett has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	Lin Lifen v PP: False Statements, Immigration Act & Penal Code Offences(Oct 2015) Goldring v PP: Cheating, Non-Reliance Clause & Inducement in Investment Scheme(Jun 2015) Public Prosecutor v Leng Kah Poh: Interpretation of s 6(a) Prevention of Corruption Act(Oct 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sandy Baggett's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Unknown	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sandy Baggett's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Unknown	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lin Lifen v PP: False Statements, Immigration Act & Penal Code Offences 25 Oct 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	25 Oct 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially dismissedThe appeal was partially dismissed, with the sentences for the seventh and eighth charges remaining unchanged.
2	Goldring v PP: Cheating, Non-Reliance Clause & Inducement in Investment Scheme 10 Jun 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	10 Jun 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Cross-Appeal DismissedCross-appeal against sentence dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Leng Kah Poh: Interpretation of s 6(a) Prevention of Corruption Act 16 Oct 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)	16 Oct 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): -
4	Leng Kah Poh v PP: Corruption Charges & F&B Contracts at IKEA Singapore 17 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	17 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was overturned.
5	Mohammad Faizal v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Drug Penalties under Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Jan 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Jan 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedSuccessfully opposed the criminal motions for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal.