Sanjna Rai

Sanjna Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 55.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sanjna Rai has demonstrated expertise across 48 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	10 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prostitution Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privacy Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Agents Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Misappropriation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Consumption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enhanced Punishments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Agents (Estate Agency Work) Regulations 2010	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
General Deterrence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sanjna Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sanjna Rai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Jafar Shatig: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2015) Lee Chuan Meng v Public Prosecutor: Enhanced Punishment for Drug Consumption(Feb 2015) Goik Soon Guan v PP: Trade Mark & Copyright Infringement Sentence Appeal(Jan 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sanjna Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	27%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	55%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sanjna Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(27%)	27%
Partial	2(18%)	18%
Won	6(55%)	55%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2015	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Jafar Shatig: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Jul 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Jul 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused was found guilty as charged.
2	Lee Chuan Meng v Public Prosecutor: Enhanced Punishment for Drug Consumption 10 Feb 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Feb 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment AffirmedThe District Court's decision to impose a term of imprisonment of five years and two months and to order three strokes of the cane was affirmed.
3	Goik Soon Guan v PP: Trade Mark & Copyright Infringement Sentence Appeal 29 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	29 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe appeal was partially dismissed as the sentence for the TMA charge was reduced, but the sentences for the rest of the proceeded charges remained unchanged.
4	PP v Quek Chin Choon: Living on Earnings of Prostitution under Women's Charter 21 Dec 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	21 Dec 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed.
5	Public Prosecutor v Prabagaran: Drug Importation & Presumption of Knowledge 02 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won	02 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty as charged.
6	Ghazali bin Mohamed Rasul v PP: Estate Agent Offences under EAR 2010 24 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	24 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, and the fines were reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Tan Peng Mong v Public Prosecutor: Taxi Driver Assault, Penal Code Sections 323 & 352 30 Oct 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	30 Oct 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against sentence was dismissed.
8	Sim Choon Wee Kenny v Public Prosecutor: Appeals on Custodial Sentence for Offenses Involving Underage Prostitute 19 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed.
9	Ong Mingwee v Public Prosecutor: Rape Conviction Appeal - Consent and Mistake of Fact 29 Nov 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	29 Nov 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, overturning the conviction obtained by the Public Prosecutor.
10	Wong Seng Kwan v PP: Dishonest Misappropriation & Finder's Duties at Marina Bay Sands Casino 16 Apr 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Apr 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed.
11	Mohamed Hisham v PP: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code on Bail for Drug & Moneylending Offences 17 Aug 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	17 Aug 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal LostThe Public Prosecutor's objection to bail was overruled.