Sim Choon Wee Kenny v Public Prosecutor: Appeals on Custodial Sentence for Offenses Involving Underage Prostitute

In Sim Choon Wee Kenny v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck on 20 September 2013, dismissed appeals against custodial sentences for offenses involving a prostitute. The court emphasized the need for strong general deterrence due to the continued flow of similar cases, finding that the mitigating factors had already been considered in the initial sentencing.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeals dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeals against custodial sentences for offenses involving an underage prostitute were dismissed, emphasizing the need for strong general deterrence due to ongoing similar offenses.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Sim Choon Wee KennyAppellantIndividualAppeal dismissedLostAnand Nalachandran
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal dismissedWonSanjna Rai, G. Kannan, Andrew Tan

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Anand NalachandranBraddell Brothers LLP
Sanjna RaiAttorney-General's Chambers
Harpreet Singh Nehal SCCavenagh Law LLP
Jerald FooCavenagh Law LLP
Keith HanCavenagh Law LLP
G. KannanAttorney-General's Chambers
Andrew TanAttorney-General's Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The appeals concerned custodial sentences for offenses involving a prostitute.
  2. The prostitute went by the professional name of “Chantelle”.
  3. The prostitute was almost of full age.
  4. There was some degree of misrepresentation by her of her age.
  5. The court considered mitigating factors personal to each appellant.
  6. New offenses were committed after the appellants’ cases.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Sim Choon Wee Kenny v Public Prosecutor and another appeal, Magistrate's Appeal No 54 and 129 of 2013, [2013] SGHC 182

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Appropriateness of Custodial Sentence
    • Outcome: The court found that a custodial sentence was warranted and dismissed the appeals.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against custodial sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Custodial sentence
  • General deterrence
  • Mitigating factors
  • Underage prostitute

15.2 Keywords

  • criminal law
  • sentencing
  • appeal
  • custodial sentence
  • prostitute

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing