Sarah Lam

Sarah Lam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in director's duties and customs act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarah Lam has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and corporate governance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
False Information	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarah Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarah Lam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Yang Suan Piau Steven v PP: Customs Act Offence & False Information(Nov 2012) Ong Chow Hong v PP: Director Disqualification for Failure to Exercise Diligence(Apr 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarah Lam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarah Lam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yang Suan Piau Steven v PP: Customs Act Offence & False Information 01 Nov 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	01 Nov 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence of two weeks' imprisonment was overturned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ong Chow Hong v PP: Director Disqualification for Failure to Exercise Diligence 12 Apr 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	12 Apr 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal to increase the disqualification period was allowed.