Sarjit Singh Gill

Sarjit Singh Gill is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 37 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 58.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 32% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated expertise across 118 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	26 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	13 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	13 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Preference	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negative Pledge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Architectural Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Profit Sharing Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Advice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pari Passu	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ascertainment of goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Invoice Discounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Payment Undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim Judicial Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarjit Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarjit Singh Gill has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 24 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	24 cases	65% of cases	Founder Group v Singapore Commodities: Winding Up Stay & Payment Out Order Dispute(Oct 2024) Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions(Aug 2024) Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up, Disputed Debt & Arbitration(Nov 2023)
Shook Lin & Bok	8 cases	22% of cases	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim(Oct 2006) Malayan Banking Bhd v Lauw Wisanggeni: Enforcement of Deed of Undertaking & Consideration in Contract Law(Sep 2003) UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens(Jun 2003)
Shook Lin and Bok	5 cases	14% of cases	Changhe v Dexia: Striking Out Action for Failure to Comply with Peremptory Order(May 2005) RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel(Oct 2004) RBG Resources v Banque Cantonale: Costs & Interest on Conversion Claim(Aug 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarjit Singh Gill's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 12 (32%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3%
Lost	133.7 parties avg	3.7	35%
Partial	27.0 parties avg	7.0	5%
Won	223.7 parties avg	3.7	59%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	46.8 parties avg	6.8
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarjit Singh Gill's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	13(34%)	34%
Partial	2(5%)	5%
Won	22(58%)	58%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	95.2421 cases	21
USD	16,892,734.87	5,630,911.623 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2004	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 37 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Founder Group v Singapore Commodities: Winding Up Stay & Payment Out Order Dispute 28 Oct 2024 Founder Group (Hong Kong) Ltd (in liquidation) (Claimant)Won	28 Oct 2024	Founder Group (Hong Kong) Ltd (in liquidation) (Claimant): Payment Out Order GrantedPayment Out Order granted in the amount of US$14,117,585.50 (assumed USD, as the debt was claimed in USD).
2	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions 20 Aug 2024 Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Won	20 Aug 2024	Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited; costs awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up, Disputed Debt & Arbitration 27 Nov 2023 Founder Group (Hong Kong) Limited (in liquidation) (Appellant, Claimant)Won	27 Nov 2023	Founder Group (Hong Kong) Limited (in liquidation) (Appellant, Claimant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and JHC ordered to be wound up. Costs awarded to Founder Group (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading 17 Aug 2023 Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Defendant)Won	17 Aug 2023	Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited as the Fraud Exception was established.
5	Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up Application Dismissed Over Disputed Debt & Arbitration Agreement 28 May 2023 Founder Group (Hong Kong) Limited (in liquidation) (Claimant)Lost	28 May 2023	Founder Group (Hong Kong) Limited (in liquidation) (Claimant): Application DismissedWinding up application dismissed with costs.
6	Tan Chin Hock v Teo Cher Koon: Contract Formation and Misrepresentation in ISDN Share Investment Dispute 11 Jul 2021 Teo Cher Koon (Defendant)Won	11 Jul 2021	Teo Cher Koon (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court awarded judgment to Teo Cher Koon in Suit 743, dismissing Tan Chin Hock's claim.
7	OCBC vs KS Energy: Interim Judicial Management under IRDA for Insolvency 17 Sep 2020 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Applicant)Won	17 Sep 2020	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Applicant): Orders sought grantedThe applicant's application for interim judicial management was granted.
8	VIK v VIL: Estate Administration, Property Sale, and Beneficiary Rights 18 Aug 2020 VIK (Plaintiff)Won	18 Aug 2020	VIK (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication granted to sell Property 2 to raise funds for the administration of the Estate.
9	CBB v Law Society of Singapore: Costs Order in Judicial Review of Regulatory Function 18 Mar 2020 CBB (Applicant)Lost	18 Mar 2020	CBB (Applicant): Costs not awardedThe Applicant's request for costs was denied.
10	Wibowo Boediono v Cristian Priwisata Yacob: Fraud, Misrepresentation, and Solicitors' Negligence 08 Jul 2018 Toh Wee Jin (Appellant)Won	08 Jul 2018	Toh Wee Jin (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; negligence claim dismissed.
11	BC Andaman v Xie Ning Yun: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration of Blue Canyon Country Club Dispute 30 Mar 2017 Murex Co Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2017	Murex Co Limited (Plaintiff): Permanent anti-suit injunction deniedPermanent anti-suit injunction denied in favour of Murex Co Limited against the Sias.
12	Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd v Bank of India: Letter of Credit & Agency 22 May 2016 Bank of India (Respondent)Dismissed	22 May 2016	Bank of India (Respondent): Claim DismissedClaim against Bank of India dismissed.
13	HSBC Trustee v Fong: Estate Administration, Executor Discharge & Mortgage Authorization 03 Mar 2016 HSBC Trustee (Singapore) Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Mar 2016	HSBC Trustee (Singapore) Limited (Plaintiff): Prayer 1 DismissedThe Plaintiff's application to be discharged as executor was dismissed.
14	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies 18 May 2015 Appellants (Appellant)Partial	18 May 2015	Appellants (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, subject to further submissions on the scope of the deputyship and the appointment of deputies.
15	Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Breach of Duty in Investment Advice Claim 25 Feb 2015 Koh Kim Teck (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	25 Feb 2015	Koh Kim Teck (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim was not struck out, and the Defendant's appeal was dismissed.
16	Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd v Bank of India: Letter of Credit Dispute 29 Dec 2014 Bank of India (Defendant)Won	29 Dec 2014	Bank of India (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against Bank of India was dismissed.
17	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Appointment of Deputies, Undue Influence 30 Sep 2013 AUR (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	30 Sep 2013	AUR (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original decision set aside; costs reversed in appellant's favor (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Lim Koon Park v Yap Jin Meng: Profit-Sharing Agreement & Misrepresentation in Property Purchase 21 Jul 2013 Riverwealth Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Jul 2013	Riverwealth Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; misrepresentation claim rejected; oral agreement for profit sharing upheld against the company.
19	Rabobank v Jurong Technologies: Unfair Preference Claim under Companies Act 15 Sep 2011 Jurong Technologies Industrial Corp Ltd (under judicial management) (Respondent)Won	15 Sep 2011	Jurong Technologies Industrial Corp Ltd (under judicial management) (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court upheld the decision to set aside the payment of US$2,775,149.37 as an unfair preference.
20	DBS Bank v Tam Chee Chong: Unfair Preference & Judicial Management 15 Sep 2011 Tam Chee Chong and another (judicial managers of Jurong Hi-Tech Industries Pte Ltd (under judicial management)) (Respondent)Won	15 Sep 2011	Tam Chee Chong and another (judicial managers of Jurong Hi-Tech Industries Pte Ltd (under judicial management)) (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal by DBS Bank Ltd was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the judicial managers.
21	Tam Chee Chong v DBS Bank: Unfair Preference in Judicial Management 17 Nov 2010 Keoy Soo Earn (Plaintiff)Won	17 Nov 2010	Keoy Soo Earn (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the defendant shall pay JHTI the total net sale proceeds received from the disposal of the MAP Shares (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Personal Liability for Costs in Security Redemption Dispute 23 May 2010 DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	23 May 2010	DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs awarded on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Validity of Receiver Appointment & Mortgage Enforcement 05 Aug 2009 DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	05 Aug 2009	DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowedAppeal in Civil Appeal No 19 of 2009 by DB Trustees is allowed. Costs of both appeals as well as the costs below awarded to DB Trustees, on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Enforcement of Trust Deed, Security Deed & Moneylenders Act 12 Mar 2009 DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Mar 2009	DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000.00 (exclusive of reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant.
25	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim 31 Oct 2006 Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Oct 2006	Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Changhe v Dexia: Striking Out Action for Failure to Comply with Peremptory Order 30 May 2005 Dexia BIL Asia Singapore Ltd (formerly known as Banque Internationale A Luxembourg BIL (Asia) Ltd) (Respondent)Won	30 May 2005	Dexia BIL Asia Singapore Ltd (formerly known as Banque Internationale A Luxembourg BIL (Asia) Ltd) (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
27	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel 28 Oct 2004 RBG Resources plc (Respondent, Appellant)Won	28 Oct 2004	RBG Resources plc (Respondent, Appellant): Successful ObjectionSuccessfully objected to the application for ad hoc admission of Mr. Henry Bernard Eder QC. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	RBG Resources v Banque Cantonale: Costs & Interest on Conversion Claim 05 Aug 2004 RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	05 Aug 2004	RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff on its claim for conversion and related costs. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
29	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Sale of Goods, Metal Transactions & Liquidator's Rights 10 Jun 2004 RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	10 Jun 2004	RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartRBG's claim was allowed, save for one drum of nickel. The sale proceeds of RBG’s metals are to be released to RBG or its solicitors, as RBG’s solicitors may direct. Damages to be paid to RBG for conversion of the nickel briquettes are the net purchase price or prices which CL has obtained for the same. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Law Society of Singapore v Subbiah Pillai: Conflict of Interest in Conveyancing Transaction 14 Apr 2004 Subbiah Pillai (Respondent)Lost	14 Apr 2004	Subbiah Pillai (Respondent): Suspension OrderedThe respondent was suspended from practice for three years.
31	Malayan Banking Bhd v Lauw Wisanggeni: Enforcement of Deed of Undertaking & Consideration in Contract Law 14 Sep 2003 Malayan Banking Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Sep 2003	Malayan Banking Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Lauw is required to purchase from the bank all or part of the 30 million shares in UFS charged by E-Info to the bank at the price of $0.17 per share and the bank is entitled to rely on other rights conferred as a result of the execution of the Deed of Undertaking. Costs awarded to MBB. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens 24 Jun 2003 UCO Bank (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	24 Jun 2003	UCO Bank (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowedPlaintiffs' appeal allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
33	UCO Bank v Golden Orient Maritime: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens 24 Jun 2003 UCO Bank (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	24 Jun 2003	UCO Bank (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedPlaintiff's appeal was allowed.
34	Progress Software v CPF Board: Interpretation of 'Payable' under CPF Act 27 Feb 2003 Progress Software Corp (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	27 Feb 2003	Progress Software Corp (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
35	Progress Software v Central Provident Board: CPF Contributions & Wage Classification 07 Aug 2002 Progress Software Corp (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Aug 2002	Progress Software Corp (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Societe Generale v Statoil: Construction of Contract Terms & Right of Recourse 09 Nov 2000 Societe Generale (Appellant)Lost	09 Nov 2000	Societe Generale (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	Super Coffeemix v Unico Trading: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off of 'Coffeemix' Brand 26 Jun 2000 Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2000	Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed. The court assumed the currency is SGD, the currency of Singapore.