OCBC vs KS Energy: Interim Judicial Management under IRDA for Insolvency
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (OCBC) applied for interim judicial management for KS Energy Limited (KSE) and KS Drilling Pte Ltd (KSD) under Section 91 of the Insolvency, Restructuring, and Dissolution Act 2018 (IRDA). The High Court of Singapore, presided over by Aedit Abdullah J, granted the orders on 18 September 2020, citing the companies' insolvency, loss of confidence in management, and the potential for a more advantageous realization of assets under judicial management.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Orders sought granted.
1.3 Case Type
Insolvency
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Singapore court grants interim judicial management for KS Energy and KS Drilling due to insolvency and loss of confidence in management.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited | Applicant | Corporation | Orders sought granted | Won | |
KS Energy Limited | Respondent | Corporation | Interim Judicial Management Ordered | Lost | |
KS Drilling Pte Ltd | Respondent | Corporation | Interim Judicial Management Ordered | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Aedit Abdullah | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- KSE is a publicly listed company on the Main Board of the Singapore Exchange.
- KSE Group provides services to the global oil and gas industry.
- The applicant bank holds about 61.14% of KSE’s total liabilities.
- Between 2016 and 2019, the KSE Group faced financial difficulties.
- Mr. Kris Wiluan was charged with 112 charges for engaging in false trading and market rigging of KSE shares.
- The applicant has lost confidence in the management of KSE and KSD.
- KSD is burning through slightly over US$1,000,000 per month in manpower and maintenance costs.
5. Formal Citations
- Re KS Energy Ltd and another matter, , [2020] SGHC 198
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Term loan dated granted by the applicant to KSD | |
Bridging loan of S$5,000,000 granted by the applicant to KSD | |
12-month debt moratorium on Jumbo loan begins | |
Deed of amendment and restatement dated | |
Supplemental letter dated | |
12-month debt moratorium on Jumbo loan ends | |
Mr Kris Wiluan charged with 112 charges | |
Hearing date | |
Orders sought granted |
7. Legal Issues
- Interim Judicial Management
- Outcome: The court granted the order for interim judicial management.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- (1987) 3 BCC 124
- [2012] BusLR D91
- [1992] SGHC 212
- Insolvency
- Outcome: The court found that there was a very clear case of balance sheet insolvency.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Order for interim judicial management
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Insolvency
- Restructuring
- Corporate Law
11. Industries
- Oil and Gas
- Finance
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Re a Company (No. 00175 of 1987) | N/A | Yes | (1987) 3 BCC 124 | N/A | Cited for the principle that an order for IJM is appropriate where there is a prima facie case for judicial management and the company's assets are in jeopardy. |
In Re Switch Services Ltd (In Administration) | N/A | Yes | [2012] BusLR D91 | N/A | Cited for the principle that it is not a prerequisite to the grant of an order for IJM that all the criteria for the granting of a judicial management order are satisfied |
Re Stephen Eric Consultants Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [1992] SGHC 212 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the appointment of a provisional liquidator was held to be justified not only to protect the Company’s assets but also to ensure that it [was] properly run and managed pending the hearing of the winding up petition |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Section 91 of the Insolvency, Restructuring, and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Section 89(1) of the Insolvency, Restructuring, and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Section 92 of the Insolvency, Restructuring, and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Interim Judicial Management
- Judicial Management
- Insolvency
- IRDA
- KSE Group
- Balance Sheet Insolvency
- Super-Majority Creditor
15.2 Keywords
- Insolvency
- Judicial Management
- Interim Judicial Management
- Singapore
- IRDA
- OCBC
- KS Energy
- KS Drilling
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Insolvency Law | 95 |
Judicial Management | 90 |
Interim Judicial Management | 90 |
Restructuring and Dissolution | 85 |
Bankruptcy | 60 |
Company Law | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Insolvency Law
- Corporate Restructuring
- Judicial Management