Sean La’Brooy

Sean La’Brooy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nominee's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debtor's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Neurology	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sean La’Brooy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sean La’Brooy has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk and Davidson	4 cases	33% of cases	Lim Swee Khiang v Borden Co: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Affairs(Jul 2005) Projector SA v Marubeni: Appeal Against Mandatory Injunction Over Vessel Arrest Under Letter of Indemnity(Jan 2005) Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004)
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	2 cases	17% of cases	Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v CIMB Securities: Review of Voluntary Arrangement Approval(Apr 2017) Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Misconduct Investigation of Non-Practicing Solicitor(Apr 2015)
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	17% of cases	LW Infrastructure v Lim Chin San: Liquidated Damages & Sub-Contract Termination(Jul 2011) Lim Chin San Contractors v LW Infrastructure: Appeal on Extension of Time and Termination in Construction Sub-Contract(Jul 2011)
Vita Law LLC	1 cases	8% of cases	Eurofins Mechem v Quek Sze Wei: Summary Judgment Appeal on Factual Concessions(Sep 2024)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	8% of cases	Joseph Clement Louis Arokiasamy v Singapore Airlines: Dismissal & Natural Justice(Aug 2002)
Wong Partnership	1 cases	8% of cases	Lian Teck Construction v Woh Hup: Stay of Proceedings & Interim Payment in Arbitration Dispute(Jul 2006)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Gobinathan Devathasan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Therapeutic Ultrasound(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sean La’Brooy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	84.6 parties avg	4.6	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	38.0 parties avg	8.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	28.7 parties avg	8.7
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sean La’Brooy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(67%)	67%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	3(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	32,000.00	4,571.437 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Eurofins Mechem v Quek Sze Wei: Summary Judgment Appeal on Factual Concessions 01 Sep 2024 Quek Sze Wei (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	01 Sep 2024	Quek Sze Wei (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Mr. Quek's appeal against the partial summary judgment was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v CIMB Securities: Review of Voluntary Arrangement Approval 02 Apr 2017 VMF3 Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Apr 2017	VMF3 Ltd (Respondent): Application allowedApplication to review the approval of the voluntary arrangement allowed; awarded costs of $8,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Misconduct Investigation of Non-Practicing Solicitor 28 Apr 2015 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	28 Apr 2015	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedLaw Society's application for leave to appoint a Disciplinary Tribunal was granted.
4	LW Infrastructure v Lim Chin San: Liquidated Damages & Sub-Contract Termination 04 Jul 2011 Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 Jul 2011	Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed on the first and second questions of law. The Award was remitted to the Arbitrator for reconsideration.
5	Lim Chin San Contractors v LW Infrastructure: Appeal on Extension of Time and Termination in Construction Sub-Contract 04 Jul 2011 Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Jul 2011	Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Gobinathan Devathasan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Therapeutic Ultrasound 09 Feb 2010 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	09 Feb 2010	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe High Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Disciplinary Committee's decision.
7	Lian Teck Construction v Woh Hup: Stay of Proceedings & Interim Payment in Arbitration Dispute 05 Jul 2006 Lian Teck Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jul 2006	Lian Teck Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the defendants fixed at $4,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Lim Swee Khiang v Borden Co: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Affairs 31 Jul 2005 C.H. Lim Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Jul 2005	C.H. Lim Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Projector SA v Marubeni: Appeal Against Mandatory Injunction Over Vessel Arrest Under Letter of Indemnity 24 Jan 2005 Projector SA (Appellant)Lost	24 Jan 2005	Projector SA (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
10	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent 02 Dec 2004 Projector SA (Appellant, Defendant)Won	02 Dec 2004	Projector SA (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; order made on 16 July 2004 by Woo J set aside. Leave granted to amend notice of appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal & Factors for Consideration 10 Aug 2004 Projector SA (Appellant)Lost	10 Aug 2004	Projector SA (Appellant): Application dismissed with costsProjector SA's application to amend the notice of appeal was dismissed, and Projector SA was ordered to pay the costs of the application. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Joseph Clement Louis Arokiasamy v Singapore Airlines: Dismissal & Natural Justice 29 Aug 2002 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	29 Aug 2002	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartThe defendant's application to strike out prayer 11(2) of the plaintiff's claim was upheld.