Sean Tan

Sean Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and damages assessment. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sean Tan has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pre-contract deposits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Network Leasing Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Franchises and Franchising	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sean Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sean Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	5 cases	71% of cases	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Affidavits(Jul 2007) Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Reply Affidavits(Jul 2007) Kaufman v Datacraft: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Agreement Interpretation(Sep 2005)
J Koh & Co	2 cases	29% of cases	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Appeal on Registrar's Directions in Construction Dispute(Sep 2001) L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Vacation of Trial Dates Pending Appeal(Sep 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sean Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.2 parties avg	4.2	71%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sean Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,847,900.00	307,983.336 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Affidavits 19 Jul 2007 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jul 2007	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for extension of time substantially rejectedThe plaintiff's application for a further extension of time to file affidavits was substantially rejected.
2	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Reply Affidavits 19 Jul 2007 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	19 Jul 2007	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Application granted in part and denied in partThe plaintiff's application for extension of time to file reply affidavits was granted in part for Mr. S P Slattery's affidavit but denied for the affidavits responding to the defendant's experts. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Kaufman v Datacraft: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Agreement Interpretation 21 Sep 2005 Lisboa Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Sep 2005	Lisboa Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Telestop v Telecom Equipment: Franchise Agreement Breach & Non-Competition 29 Nov 2004 Telecom Equipment Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Nov 2004	Telecom Equipment Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	United Artists v Parkway Properties: Recovery of Pre-Contract Payments for Cineplex Development 19 Aug 2002 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No. 1008 (Defendant)Lost	19 Aug 2002	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No. 1008 (Defendant): Judgment AgainstJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of $1,846,900 with interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Appeal on Registrar's Directions in Construction Dispute 27 Sep 2001 L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	27 Sep 2001	L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the Registrar's directions was dismissed with costs of $500 to be paid to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Vacation of Trial Dates Pending Appeal 27 Sep 2001 L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	27 Sep 2001	L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the Registrar's directions was dismissed with costs of $500 to be paid to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.