See Wern Hao

See Wern Hao is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in letter of credit law and trust law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

See Wern Hao has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Discharge Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver by election	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adverse Inference	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Wern Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

See Wern Hao has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Omni Law LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions(Aug 2024) DLT v Thampi: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Disobeying Data Deletion Order(Jun 2024) Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of See Wern Hao's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	17%
Won	110.0 parties avg	10.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	46.9 parties avg	6.9
2024	26.5 parties avg	6.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of See Wern Hao's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	200,000.00	66,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions 20 Aug 2024 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Aug 2024	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Winson to pay costs to OCBC and SCB fixed at $200,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	DLT v Thampi: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Disobeying Data Deletion Order 25 Jun 2024 Suji Mannattu Thampi (Defendant)Won	25 Jun 2024	Suji Mannattu Thampi (Defendant): Costs AwardedCosts awarded to the first defendant, to be fixed by the court if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading 17 Aug 2023 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Aug 2023	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedWinson Oil Trading Pte Ltd's claim against Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd and Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Ltd was dismissed due to the Fraud Exception being established.
4	Cosmetic Care Asia v Sri Linarti: Striking Out Application for Breach of Settlement Agreement 01 May 2023 Global Beauty International Pte. Limited (Plaintiff)Neutral	01 May 2023	Global Beauty International Pte. Limited (Plaintiff): Application to strike out claim dismissedDefendants' application to strike out the Plaintiffs' claim was dismissed.
5	Er Kok Yong v Tan Cheng Cheng: Constructive & Resulting Trusts Dispute over BMW M6 Ownership 09 Mar 2023 Er Kok Yong (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Mar 2023	Er Kok Yong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for sole beneficial ownership of the Vehicle based on common intention constructive trust and resulting trust was dismissed.
6	Er Kok Yong v Tan Cheng Cheng: Beneficial Ownership of Property Dispute 16 Feb 2023 Lim Soon Hwa Lawrence (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Feb 2023	Lim Soon Hwa Lawrence (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for beneficial ownership of the property was dismissed.