Shahira binte Mohd Anuar

Shahira binte Mohd Anuar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	6 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Actuarial Science	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Incident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landscape Design	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shahira binte Mohd Anuar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	5 cases	83% of cases	Ng Li Ning v Ting Jun Heng: Apportionment of Liability in Traffic Accident(Sep 2021) Puspa Sinnappa v Balasingam: Assessment of Damages in Fatal Road Accident(Jul 2021) Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident(Feb 2021)
Securus Legal LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Rajina Sharma v Theyvasigamani: Damages for Severe Brain Injury & Loss of Earnings(Feb 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shahira binte Mohd Anuar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.6 parties avg	3.6	67%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shahira binte Mohd Anuar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,940,785.56	970,392.782 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rajina Sharma v Theyvasigamani: Damages for Severe Brain Injury & Loss of Earnings 12 Feb 2024 Theyvasigamani s/o Periasamy (Defendant)Lost	12 Feb 2024	Theyvasigamani s/o Periasamy (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; liable for 75% of the damages awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ng Li Ning v Ting Jun Heng: Apportionment of Liability in Traffic Accident 29 Sep 2021 Yap Kok Hua (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2021	Yap Kok Hua (Respondent): Successful in resisting appealSuccessfully resisted the appeal. Awarded costs fixed at $22,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Puspa Sinnappa v Balasingam: Assessment of Damages in Fatal Road Accident 01 Jul 2021 Yeoh Brothers Services Pte Ltd t/a Aero Supply Chartered Bus & Transport Trading (Defendant)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Yeoh Brothers Services Pte Ltd t/a Aero Supply Chartered Bus & Transport Trading (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to the Plaintiff in the amount of $970,392.78 (subject to 85% liability on account of contributory negligence). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 24 Feb 2021 Yap Kok Hua (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Yap Kok Hua (Defendant): Liability ApportionedThe first defendant was found 65% liable for the plaintiff's injuries. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
5	Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 01 Oct 2020 Yap Kok Hua (Defendant)Lost	01 Oct 2020	Yap Kok Hua (Defendant): Liability ApportionedLiability apportioned at 65%. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
6	Ng Chong Ping v Ng Chih-Ming Daren: Amendment Application & Costs Allocation in Negligence Claim 19 Mar 2015 Ng Chih-Ming Daren (Defendant)Neutral	19 Mar 2015	Ng Chih-Ming Daren (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for this party is neutral as the appeal concerned costs allocation.