Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident

In Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua, the Singapore High Court addressed negligence claims following a traffic accident. The plaintiff, Ting Jun Heng, sued the first defendant, Yap Kok Hua (taxi driver), and the second defendant, Ng Li Ning, for damages resulting from a collision at a discretionary right turn. The court found the first defendant primarily liable for making an unsafe turn and the second defendant liable for speeding and failing to keep a proper lookout. The court apportioned liability 65% to the first defendant and 35% to the second defendant. The court found the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff; liability apportioned 65% to the first defendant and 35% to the second defendant. Plaintiff not contributorily negligent.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Oral Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court judgment on negligence claims arising from a traffic accident, apportioning liability between drivers and addressing contributory negligence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Ting Jun HengPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffWonRamasamy s/o Karuppan Chettiar
Yap Kok HuaDefendantIndividualLiability ApportionedLostTeo Weng Kie, Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar
Ng Li NingDefendantIndividualLiability ApportionedLostWee Anthony, Fendrick Koh

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Aedit AbdullahJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Ramasamy s/o Karuppan ChettiarCentral Chambers Law Corporation
Teo Weng KieTan Kok Quan Partnership
Shahira Binte Mohd AnuarTan Kok Quan Partnership
Wee AnthonyUnited Legal Alliance LLC
Fendrick KohUnited Legal Alliance LLC

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff was a passenger in a taxi driven by the first defendant.
  2. The taxi was making a discretionary right turn at a junction.
  3. The taxi was hit by a vehicle driven by the second defendant, who was going straight through the junction.
  4. The traffic lights were in favor of the second defendant.
  5. The second defendant was exceeding the speed limit.
  6. The first defendant pleaded guilty to charges related to the accident.
  7. The plaintiff claimed damages for negligence against both defendants.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua and another, Suit No 307 of 2019, [2020] SGHC 211

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accident occurred
Suit filed (Suit No 307 of 2019)
Trial began (16–19 June)
Judgment reserved
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found both defendants negligent in their respective actions, contributing to the accident.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to keep a proper lookout
      • Speeding
      • Breach of duty of care
    • Related Cases:
      • [2007] 2 SLR(R) 211
      • [2005] 2 SLR(R) 455
  2. Contributory Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to wear a seatbelt
    • Related Cases:
      • [1976] QB 286
      • [1999] 3 SLR(R) 377
  3. Apportionment of Liability
    • Outcome: The court apportioned liability 65% to the first defendant and 35% to the second defendant.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents
  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • Transportation

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
SBS Transit Ltd v Stafford Rosemary Anne Jane (administratrix of the estate of Anthony John Stafford, deceased)Court of AppealYes[2007] 2 SLR(R) 211SingaporeCited for the principle that drivers must exercise due care even when having the right of way.
Ong Bee Nah v Won Siew Wan (Yong Tian Choy, third party)Court of AppealYes[2005] 2 SLR(R) 455SingaporeCited to emphasize that the specific facts of each case are important in determining liability in negligence claims.
Froom v ButcherQueen's BenchYes[1976] QB 286England and WalesCited for the principle that contributory negligence applies to the damages that flow from an accident, not just the accident itself.
Parno v SC Marine Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[1999] 3 SLR(R) 377SingaporeCited for approving the principle in Froom v Butcher regarding contributory negligence and its effect on damages.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Discretionary right turn
  • Apportionment of liability
  • Contributory negligence
  • Speeding
  • Duty of care
  • Proper lookout

15.2 Keywords

  • Negligence
  • Traffic accident
  • Contributory negligence
  • Apportionment
  • Singapore
  • High Court

16. Subjects

  • Tort Law
  • Negligence Law
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents

17. Areas of Law

  • Tort
  • Negligence
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Civil Procedure