Shana Poon

Shana Poon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shana Poon has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mandatory Treatment Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Shana Poon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shana Poon has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	7 cases	100% of cases	Reduan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Appeal under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2021) Imran v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, Wilful Blindness, Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2020) PP v Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway: Trafficking, Possession of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shana Poon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	43%
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shana Poon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Reduan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Appeal under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeals by Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar and Nazeeha binte Abu Hasan were dismissed.
2	Imran v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, Wilful Blindness, Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Dec 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	17 Dec 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal on the charge against Pragas was allowed and he was acquitted of this charge.
3	PP v Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway: Trafficking, Possession of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won	29 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway.
4	PP v Imran, Pragas, Tamil: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 01 Jul 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	01 Jul 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused were convicted and sentenced to death.
5	Ramesh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Statutory Interpretation 14 Mar 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	14 Mar 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part for Ramesh, and his conviction was amended to possession simpliciter.
6	GCX v Public Prosecutor: MTO Suitability Report & Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt 23 Jan 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	23 Jan 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was allowed and the original sentence was overturned.
7	Soh Qiu Xia Katty v Public Prosecutor: Repeat Offender Drug Trafficking Sentencing 27 Nov 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Nov 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was reduced.