Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy

Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal loan	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intoxication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third party proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casino Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	7 cases	78% of cases	Resorts World at Sentosa v Goel Adesh Kumar: Costs Allocation in Third-Party Proceedings and Offer to Settle(Oct 2018) Resorts World v Lee Fook Kheun: Casino Credit Facility, Intoxication & Contract Rescission(Jul 2018) Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Sze Siu Hung: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Setting Aside Default Judgment(Apr 2018)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	1 cases	11% of cases	BWN v BWO: Interim Injunction to Restrain Call on Performance Bonds in Construction Dispute(Apr 2019)
Rajah Velu & Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Poh Sai v Public Prosecutor: Shoplifting Conviction Appeal Dismissed(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%
Partial	43.5 parties avg	3.5	44%
Won	43.2 parties avg	3.2	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Partial	4(40%)	40%
Won	4(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,004,060.18	1,501,015.054 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BWN v BWO: Interim Injunction to Restrain Call on Performance Bonds in Construction Dispute 11 Apr 2019 BWN (Applicant)Won	11 Apr 2019	BWN (Applicant): Interim Injunction GrantedInterim injunction granted to restrain the respondent from calling on and/or receiving payment on performance bonds. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Resorts World at Sentosa v Goel Adesh Kumar: Costs Allocation in Third-Party Proceedings and Offer to Settle 01 Oct 2018 Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	01 Oct 2018	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partRWS's appeal was allowed in part, modifying the cost orders to reflect that Mr. Goel should bear 80% of SATS's costs in the third-party proceedings.
3	Resorts World v Lee Fook Kheun: Casino Credit Facility, Intoxication & Contract Rescission 30 Jul 2018 Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2018	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $5,930,595.00 plus interest (currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Sze Siu Hung: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Setting Aside Default Judgment 26 Apr 2018 Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Apr 2018	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeals DismissedDefendant's appeals and application to adduce further evidence dismissed.
5	Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World: Costs Allocation After Partially Successful Claim for Negligence, Assault, and Wrongful Imprisonment 08 Mar 2017 Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	08 Mar 2017	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial LossLiable for 80% of the damages awarded to the plaintiff, amounting to $36,732.59. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
6	Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World: False Imprisonment, Assault & Battery in Casino 03 Nov 2015 Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	03 Nov 2015	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against the defendant in partJudgment against the defendant in part. The Casino is liable for $36,732.59, that being 80% of the total damages that I have awarded (ie, $45,915.74). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Precise Development v Holcim: Dispute over Concrete Supply Contract due to Indonesian Sand Ban 16 Nov 2009 Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Nov 2009	Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against the defendantInterlocutory judgment awarded against the defendant, with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
8	Worldwide Convention Planners v Lee Khiam Long: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Duties 14 Sep 2008 Chris Lyn Investment Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	14 Sep 2008	Chris Lyn Investment Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim for Trespass Dismissed; Claim for Wrongful Caveat AllowedThe fourth defendant's counterclaim for trespass was dismissed. The claim for the wrongful caveat lodged on 26 September 2006 was allowed, and damages, if any, to be assessed.
9	Poh Sai v Public Prosecutor: Shoplifting Conviction Appeal Dismissed 16 Oct 2003 Poh Sai (Appellant)Lost	16 Oct 2003	Poh Sai (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against her conviction was dismissed.