Spring Tan

Spring Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restraint of trade and collective sales. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Spring Tan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and restraint of trade.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-Solicitation Clause	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Land disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abandonment of Easement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Spring Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Spring Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong	3 cases	60% of cases	Dynamic Investments v Lee Chee Kian: Collective Sale Dispute over Strata Title Distribution(Dec 2007) Man Financial v Wong: Breach of Non-Solicitation Clause & Restraint of Trade(Nov 2007) Wong Bark Chuan David v Man Financial: Restraint of Trade & Termination Agreement Dispute(Jan 2007)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Wee Siew Bock v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Rights, Abandonment, and Interference(Jun 2012)
Chan Tan & Partners	1 cases	20% of cases	L & W Building Construction v King Wah Construction: Defective Works Dispute(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Spring Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.5 parties avg	2.5	60%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	33.2 parties avg	3.2
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Spring Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wee Siew Bock v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Rights, Abandonment, and Interference 27 Jun 2012 Chia Foong Lin (Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2012	Chia Foong Lin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Dynamic Investments v Lee Chee Kian: Collective Sale Dispute over Strata Title Distribution 12 Dec 2007 Sim Hock Cheng (Defendant, Respondent)Won	12 Dec 2007	Sim Hock Cheng (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs to the respondent. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Man Financial v Wong: Breach of Non-Solicitation Clause & Restraint of Trade 28 Nov 2007 Wong Bark Chuan David (Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2007	Wong Bark Chuan David (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the respondent was not entitled to the Compensation under the Termination Agreement.
4	Wong Bark Chuan David v Man Financial: Restraint of Trade & Termination Agreement Dispute 17 Jan 2007 Wong Bark Chuan David (Plaintiff)Won	17 Jan 2007	Wong Bark Chuan David (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	L & W Building Construction v King Wah Construction: Defective Works Dispute 22 Nov 2000 King Wah Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	22 Nov 2000	King Wah Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, stay of proceedings ordered pending arbitration.