Stacey Anne Fernandez

Stacey Anne Fernandez is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and food, drug and cosmetics. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and food, drug and cosmetics.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	23% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 23% of their total caseload.
Food, Drug and Cosmetics	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Health Products Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stacey Anne Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Stacey Anne Fernandez has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Raj Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust and Entrustment under Section 405 Penal Code(Sep 2021) Raj Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust & Identity of Entrusting Party(Mar 2021) PP v Koh Peng Kiat: Trade Marks Act Defences & Health Products Act Strict Liability(Nov 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Stacey Anne Fernandez's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Stacey Anne Fernandez's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Raj Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust and Entrustment under Section 405 Penal Code 13 Sep 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Sep 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion dismissedThe criminal motion brought by the applicant was dismissed.
2	Raj Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust & Identity of Entrusting Party 14 Mar 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Mar 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	PP v Koh Peng Kiat: Trade Marks Act Defences & Health Products Act Strict Liability 23 Nov 2015 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Neutral	23 Nov 2015	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Legal principles clarifiedThe Public Prosecutor sought clarification on three questions of law. The court provided guidance on these issues.