Stacey Fernandez

Stacey Fernandez is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and corruption, drug trafficking and other serious crimes (confiscation of benefits) act. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stacey Fernandez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Stacey Fernandez has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	Chai Chung Hoong v Public Prosecutor: Director's Diligence & Companies Act Breach(Feb 2023) Lim Chit Foo v Public Prosecutor: Legality of Multiple Trials & Standing Down Charges in IRAS PIC Scheme Fraud(Nov 2019) PP v. Rajendar Prasad Rai: CDSA Application for Restraint & Charging Orders over Suspected Criminal Proceeds(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Stacey Fernandez's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Stacey Fernandez's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chai Chung Hoong v Public Prosecutor: Director's Diligence & Companies Act Breach 06 Feb 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Feb 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.
2	Lim Chit Foo v Public Prosecutor: Legality of Multiple Trials & Standing Down Charges in IRAS PIC Scheme Fraud 18 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Arguments partially rejectedThe court rejected the argument that the decision to stand down charges is a matter purely within the Prosecution’s discretion.
3	PP v. Rajendar Prasad Rai: CDSA Application for Restraint & Charging Orders over Suspected Criminal Proceeds 31 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff, Applicant)Partial	31 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff, Applicant): Orders Granted in PartOrders granted for restraint of specific bank accounts and charging orders on properties.
4	Rajendar Prasad Rai v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Order for Seizure of Property under Criminal Procedure Code 12 Mar 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	12 Mar 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Order Set AsideThe Magistrate's Order to extend the seizure of funds was set aside.