Subir Singh Panoo

Subir Singh Panoo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and assessment of damages. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Motorcycle Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Volenti non fit injuria	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subir Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Subir Singh Panoo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sim Mong Teck & Partners	3 cases	75% of cases	Rashid Osman v Abdul Muhaimin: Negligence, Motorcycle Accident, and Illegality Defense(Feb 2013) Ng Kum Thong v Moktar Bin Yusof: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury(Dec 2012) Jagbir Singh v Lim Keh Thye: Deemed Discontinuance & Notice of Change of Solicitors(Jul 2009)
Sim Mong Teck and Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	Kwok Seng Fatt Jeremy v Choy Chee Hau: Personal Injury Claim for Paraplegia Resulting from Motor Vehicle Accident(Dec 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Subir Singh Panoo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Subir Singh Panoo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,251,800.15	417,266.723 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rashid Osman v Abdul Muhaimin: Negligence, Motorcycle Accident, and Illegality Defense 26 Feb 2013 Rashid Osman bin Abdul Razak (Plaintiff)Won	26 Feb 2013	Rashid Osman bin Abdul Razak (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff on the basis of 100% liability against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ng Kum Thong v Moktar Bin Yusof: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury 27 Dec 2012 Ng Kum Thong (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Dec 2012	Ng Kum Thong (Plaintiff): Partial VictoryJudgment for the plaintiff; damages assessed at $459,806.46 after 75% liability attributed to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Jagbir Singh v Lim Keh Thye: Deemed Discontinuance & Notice of Change of Solicitors 14 Jul 2009 Jagbir Singh s/o Baldhiraj Singh (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jul 2009	Jagbir Singh s/o Baldhiraj Singh (Plaintiff): LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Kwok Seng Fatt Jeremy v Choy Chee Hau: Personal Injury Claim for Paraplegia Resulting from Motor Vehicle Accident 09 Dec 2003 Kwok Seng Fatt Jeremy (Plaintiff)Won	09 Dec 2003	Kwok Seng Fatt Jeremy (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $791,993.69 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).