Suhaimi Bin Lazim

Suhaimi Bin Lazim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and pharmaceutical law. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated expertise across 69 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Patents	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Therapeutic Products Registration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Process Chemistry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum of costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Invalidity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Invalidity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bad faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Therapeutic Products Regulation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Therapeutic Goods Regulations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Patents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Priority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Industrial application	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vacant Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vendor's Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Food, Drug and Cosmetics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suhaimi Bin Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Suhaimi Bin Lazim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mirandah Law LLP	14 cases	88% of cases	Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Zyfas Medical: Patent Infringement, Bortezomib Synthesis & Validity(Dec 2023) CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Costs Assessment in SICC(Oct 2023) CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Breach of Natural Justice(May 2023)
Shook Lin & Bok	2 cases	13% of cases	Hoban Steven Maurice Dixon v Scanlon Graeme John: Valuation of Minority Shares in Oppression Claim(Jul 2006) Sin Sai Peng v Soh Kim Lian Florence: Property Dispute Involving Unpaid Purchase Price and Vacant Possession(Oct 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Suhaimi Bin Lazim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 2 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.0 parties avg	3.0	38%
Partial	32.5 parties avg	2.5	19%
Won	72.5 parties avg	2.5	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2023	32.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Suhaimi Bin Lazim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(38%)	38%
Partial	3(19%)	19%
Won	7(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	565,673.11	51,424.8311 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Zyfas Medical: Patent Infringement, Bortezomib Synthesis & Validity 28 Dec 2023 Johnson & Johnson Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Dec 2023	Johnson & Johnson Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim of patent infringement dismissed.
2	CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Costs Assessment in SICC 30 Oct 2023 CYW (Applicant)Lost	30 Oct 2023	CYW (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed, and CYW was ordered to pay costs of S$174,734.41 inclusive of GST and disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Breach of Natural Justice 30 May 2023 CYW (Applicant)Lost	30 May 2023	CYW (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed, and CYW was ordered to pay CYX's costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Zuraimi v Zulkarnine: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Investment Losses in Halal F&B Companies 11 Oct 2020 Masmunah bte Abdullah (Defendant)Won	11 Oct 2020	Masmunah bte Abdullah (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant.
5	Zyfas Medical v Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Patent Declaration & Therapeutic Product Registration 26 Aug 2020 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	26 Aug 2020	Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs fixed at $40,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tomy Inc v Dentsply Sirona Inc: Trade Mark Invalidity & Bad Faith Dispute 19 May 2020 Dentsply Sirona Inc. (Respondent)Won	19 May 2020	Dentsply Sirona Inc. (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Dentsply Sirona Inc. entitled to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Zyfas Medical: Statutory Interpretation & Patent Disclosure 06 Feb 2020 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Plaintiff)Won	06 Feb 2020	Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Plaintiff): Declaration GrantedThe court granted the plaintiff's declaration that the defendant's declaration omitted to disclose matter that is material to its application for registration of its therapeutic product.
8	Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Drug Houses of Australia: Patent Infringement & Injunctions 29 Apr 2019 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	29 Apr 2019	Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partCivil Appeal No 79 of 2018 allowed and costs awarded to the Appellant at $25,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). The costs order of $5,000 awarded to the Respondent for the striking out application is reversed so that the same amount is now payable to the Appellant. The costs order of $7,000 awarded to the Respondent for the application for an injunction is varied by reducing the amount payable to the Respondent to $3,500.
9	Strait Colonies v SMRT Alpha: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Lease Agreement 03 Jul 2018 Strait Colonies Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	03 Jul 2018	Strait Colonies Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $60,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the respondent on an indemnity basis.
10	Millennium Pharmaceuticals v. Drug Houses of Australia: Patent Infringement & Therapeutic Product Registration 26 Jun 2018 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Jun 2018	Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Plaintiff): Striking-out application partially allowed againstDefendant's striking-out application allowed in part; Plaintiff's application for interlocutory injunction dismissed. No monetary amount specified.
11	Novartis v Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patent Register Rectification 19 Dec 2017 Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	19 Dec 2017	Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedNovartis's application for rectification of the patent register was allowed.
12	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty 31 Jul 2017 Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	31 Jul 2017	Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs to be taxed or agreed, including the costs of and incidental to the application for leave to appeal.
13	Joseph Ramanathan v Stratech Systems Ltd: Commission Dispute in Employment Contract 06 Oct 2016 Stratech Systems Limited (Defendant)Lost	06 Oct 2016	Stratech Systems Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the remainder of $62,348.70 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty in Pharmaceutical Patent Dispute 25 May 2016 Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	25 May 2016	Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's application to amend the patent was dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Hoban Steven Maurice Dixon v Scanlon Graeme John: Valuation of Minority Shares in Oppression Claim 30 Jul 2006 Vivaldi Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jul 2006	Vivaldi Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Invitation to vary the expert’s valuation dismissedThe court dismissed the plaintiffs’ invitation to vary the expert’s valuation. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Sin Sai Peng v Soh Kim Lian Florence: Property Dispute Involving Unpaid Purchase Price and Vacant Possession 09 Oct 2002 Lee Kim Me (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Oct 2002	Lee Kim Me (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartClaim for unpaid balance of purchase price allowed in part; $101,795 to be paid by the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).