Suhaimi Lazim

Suhaimi Lazim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and winding up. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Invoice Discounting	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Payment Undertaking	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agreement to Lease	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suhaimi Lazim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Suhaimi Lazim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	7 cases	88% of cases	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim(Oct 2006) Bermuda Trust v Richard Wee: Trust Administration Fees and Interest on Delayed Distribution(Feb 2002) Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Breach of Contract & Proof of Debt in Liquidation(Jul 2001)
ShookLin & Bok	1 cases	13% of cases	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Appeal Timing & Further Arguments(Jun 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Suhaimi Lazim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Other	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	13%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2002	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Suhaimi Lazim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Other	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	1(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2001	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Other: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim 31 Oct 2006 Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Oct 2006	Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Bermuda Trust v Richard Wee: Trust Administration Fees and Interest on Delayed Distribution 06 Feb 2002 Bermuda Trust (Singapore) Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Feb 2002	Bermuda Trust (Singapore) Ltd (Plaintiff): PartialTrustees ordered to pay interest on delayed payments but were allowed to value the property at $3 million for fee calculation.
3	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Breach of Contract & Proof of Debt in Liquidation 05 Jul 2001 Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	05 Jul 2001	Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Application DismissedThomson Plaza's application to recover damages for breach of contract was dismissed.
4	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Appeal Timing & Further Arguments 20 Jun 2001 The Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	20 Jun 2001	The Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Pte Ltd (Respondent): Motion dismissedMotion to strike out notice of appeal was dismissed.
5	Yeo Yoke Mui v Kong Hoo: Assessment of Damages for Property Purchase Repudiation 07 Feb 2001 Ng Liang Poh (Defendant)Other	07 Feb 2001	Ng Liang Poh (Defendant): Damages to be borne by Mr. NgAny damages ordered to be paid by Ms. Yeo to KHPL would actually be borne by Mr. Ng.
6	Societe Generale v Statoil: Construction of Contract Terms & Right of Recourse 09 Nov 2000 Societe Generale (Appellant)Lost	09 Nov 2000	Societe Generale (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Super Coffeemix v Unico Trading: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off of 'Coffeemix' Brand 26 Jun 2000 Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2000	Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed. The court assumed the currency is SGD, the currency of Singapore.
8	Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific: Payment Confirmation & Invoice Discounting Dispute 19 Apr 2000 Societe Generale (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Apr 2000	Societe Generale (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.