Suhas Malhotra

Suhas Malhotra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in health products act and securities. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Health Products Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Securities	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offering securities without a prospectus	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Optometry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Food, Drug and Cosmetics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suhas Malhotra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Suhas Malhotra has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	9 cases	100% of cases	Lau Wan Heng v Public Prosecutor: Market Rigging & Securities Act Offences(Oct 2021) Sulaiman bin Mohd Hassan v Public Prosecutor: Plying for Hire & Motor Vehicle Insurance(Jun 2021) Tang Keng Lai v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Abuse of Process, and Costs Implications(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Suhas Malhotra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Remanded	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Suhas Malhotra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(11%)	11%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Remanded	1(11%)	11%
Won	6(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	2,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Remanded: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lau Wan Heng v Public Prosecutor: Market Rigging & Securities Act Offences 21 Oct 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal.
2	Sulaiman bin Mohd Hassan v Public Prosecutor: Plying for Hire & Motor Vehicle Insurance 01 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
3	Tang Keng Lai v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Abuse of Process, and Costs Implications 10 May 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 May 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $2,000 awarded to the Prosecution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Public Prosecutor v Tan Seo Whatt Albert: Securities and Futures Act - Offering Securities Without Prospectus 27 Jun 2019 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Jun 2019	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed.
5	PP v Koh Peng Kiat: Trade Marks Act Defences & Health Products Act Strict Liability 23 Nov 2015 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Neutral	23 Nov 2015	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Legal principles clarifiedThe Public Prosecutor sought clarification on three questions of law. The court provided guidance on these issues.
6	PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Remanded	27 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Cases remitted to the JudgeThe cases concerning Abdul Kahar and Chum were remitted to the Judge, who shall determine whether Abdul Kahar’s and Chum’s involvement in the offences under ss 5(1) and 7 of the MDA respectively was restricted to the activities under ss 33B(2)(a) and 33B(3)(a).
7	Public Prosecutor v Koh Peng Kiat: Appeal Against Conviction for Trade Mark and Health Products Act Violations 04 Sep 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	04 Sep 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against sentence was dismissed as the convictions for the fourteen charges do not stand.
8	Tan Beng Chua v PP: False Statements to Official Assignee under Bankruptcy Act 03 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision of the District Judge was dismissed.
9	Yusran bin Yusoff v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Consumption Conviction and Sentence 15 Apr 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Apr 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.