Tammy Low

Tammy Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical law and medical disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tammy Low has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and medical law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Medical Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Overcharging of fees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Doctor's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Case Disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tammy Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tammy Low has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Appointment(May 2011) Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Revocation(May 2011) Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Application for Quashing and Prohibiting Orders(May 2011)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	20% of cases	Vellama v AG: Prime Minister's Discretion on By-Elections in Hougang SMC(Jul 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tammy Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tammy Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vellama v AG: Prime Minister's Discretion on By-Elections in Hougang SMC 31 Jul 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	31 Jul 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe application was dismissed in favour of the respondent.
2	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Appointment 25 May 2011 LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Applicant)Lost	25 May 2011	LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for a Quashing Order, a Prohibiting Order, and a Declaration were all dismissed.
3	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Revocation 25 May 2011 LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Applicant)Lost	25 May 2011	LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Applicant): Discovery application dismissedThe applicant's application for discovery was dismissed.
4	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Application for Quashing and Prohibiting Orders 25 May 2011 LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Applicant)Won	25 May 2011	LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Applicant): Leave GrantedLeave granted to apply for a Quashing Order and a Prohibiting Order.
5	Front Row v Daimler: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 14 Mar 2010 Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant, Respondent)Partial	14 Mar 2010	Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant, Respondent): Application allowed in partPart of the award dealing with Front Row’s counterclaim and with costs of the Arbitration be set aside as a whole.