Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam

Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Family Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Deed of Separation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ann Tan & Associates	5 cases	100% of cases	WBI v WBJ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(Aug 2022) WDO v WDP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Claim in Divorce(May 2022) ANX v ANY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Enforceability of Deed of Separation in Divorce(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Partial	42.0 parties avg	2.0	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Anamah Nee Nagalingam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,417,294.48	2,139,098.163 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WBI v WBJ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 10 Aug 2022 WBJ (Respondent)Partial	10 Aug 2022	WBJ (Respondent): Orders upheld with variationOrders upheld with variation to the income ratio for child maintenance.
2	WDO v WDP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Claim in Divorce 23 May 2022 WDO (Plaintiff)Partial	23 May 2022	WDO (Plaintiff): Division of matrimonial assets 60:40 in her favor; no maintenance orderedThe court divided the matrimonial assets 60:40 in favor of the Wife and made no orders as to maintenance for the Wife, with liberty to the Wife to apply. The Wife is entitled to S$5,248,313.56. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	ANX v ANY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Enforceability of Deed of Separation in Divorce 24 Nov 2014 ANY (Defendant)Partial	24 Nov 2014	ANY (Defendant): Partial JudgmentWife awarded 8% of the remaining matrimonial assets, amounting to $68,216.38 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Wauters v Van Den Brande: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce 31 Oct 2011 Sigrid Else Roger Marthe Wauters (Plaintiff)Partial	31 Oct 2011	Sigrid Else Roger Marthe Wauters (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentReceived 50% of the matrimonial assets valued at approximately S$2,201,529.07 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Re Jiangshan Investment Consortium Ltd: Competing Claims for Dividend Payments in Winding Up 04 Jun 2007 Fong Kam Mui (Respondent)Lost	04 Jun 2007	Fong Kam Mui (Respondent): LostClaim for entitlement to the dividend was denied.