Tan Beng Hwee Paul

Tan Beng Hwee Paul is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and recourse against award. Their track record shows a 56.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	8 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	7 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside default judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural fairness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Due Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Time Limit Extension	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Beng Hwee Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Beng Hwee Paul has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	7 cases	78% of cases	China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2020) Sun Travels v Hilton: Enforceability of Singapore Judgment in Maldives, Examination of Judgment Debtor(Dec 2019) BXS v BXT: Costs for Setting Aside Final Award in SICC Arbitration(Sep 2019)
Cavenagh Law LLP	2 cases	22% of cases	CKH v CKG: Appeal on Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction and Award Remission under UNCITRAL Model Law(Aug 2022) CKH v CKG: Appeal on Arbitration Award Remission Regarding Principal Debt and Interest(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Beng Hwee Paul's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	22%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	56%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Beng Hwee Paul's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	5(56%)	56%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,000.00	40,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CKH v CKG: Appeal on Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction and Award Remission under UNCITRAL Model Law 29 Aug 2022 CKG (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	29 Aug 2022	CKG (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs of $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	CKH v CKG: Appeal on Arbitration Award Remission Regarding Principal Debt and Interest 07 Apr 2022 CKG (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	07 Apr 2022	CKG (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; CKG awarded $50,000 for the costs of the appeal, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 27 Feb 2020 China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2020	China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedCMNC's appeal to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
4	Sun Travels v Hilton: Enforceability of Singapore Judgment in Maldives, Examination of Judgment Debtor 23 Dec 2019 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Dec 2019	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision to allow questions regarding assets in the Maldives during examination of judgment debtor proceedings was dismissed.
5	BXS v BXT: Costs for Setting Aside Final Award in SICC Arbitration 10 Sep 2019 BXT (Defendant)Won	10 Sep 2019	BXT (Defendant): Costs AwardedThe Defendant was awarded costs of S$40,000, with simple interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of this judgment until payment by the Plaintiff.
6	BXS v BXT: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Time Limit Extension & Arbitrator Composition 19 Jun 2019 BXT (Defendant)Won	19 Jun 2019	BXT (Defendant): Striking Out Application SucceedsThe Defendant’s striking out application succeeds.
7	BQP v BQQ: Appeal Against Jurisdictional Ruling in SIAC Arbitration 13 Mar 2018 BQP (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	13 Mar 2018	BQP (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application for leave to appeal dismissedThe Plaintiff's application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
8	GD Midea v Tornado: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract 06 Aug 2017 GD Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	06 Aug 2017	GD Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partMidea's application in OS 15/2017 was granted and the court set aside paras 8.25, 8.29–8.31, 9.11, 9.12, 11.3, 13.4, 13.5, 21.19, 21.26, 23.3, 28.9 and 29.10 (to the extent the interest awarded related to any of the awards set aside) of the Award.
9	Phosagro Asia v Piattchanine: Termination of Employment Contract for Serious Misconduct 27 Oct 2016 PHOSAGRO ASIA PTE LTD (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	27 Oct 2016	PHOSAGRO ASIA PTE LTD (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partThe court found the Respondent guilty of serious misconduct, reversing the lower court's decision on this issue.