Tan Cheow Hin

Tan Cheow Hin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and negligence. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 54% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-delegable duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Independent contractors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ultra-hazardous activities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mandatory Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equipment Supply	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Syariah	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Cheow Hin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CH Partners	8 cases	62% of cases	Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage(Sep 2017) Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage(Jun 2016) Viknesh Dairy Farm v Balakrishnan: Mandatory Injunction, Fraud, Agency, and Earth Dumping Dispute(Jan 2015)
Cheow Hin & Partners	4 cases	31% of cases	Elis Tjoa v United Overseas Bank: Forgery, Bank's Duty of Care & Contractual Terms(Jan 2003) Fu Hai Construction v Econ Corporation: Misrepresentation & Construction Subcontract Dispute(Aug 2002) John While Springs v Goh Sai Chuah: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Business Diversion(May 2001)
M/s CH Partners	1 cases	8% of cases	Store+Deliver+Logistics v Chin Siew Gim: Architect Negligence & Breach of Contract in Warehouse Construction(Apr 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Cheow Hin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 7 (54%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	95.5 parties avg	5.5	69%
Neutral	112.0 parties avg	12.0	8%
Won	43.0 parties avg	3.0	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	210.3 parties avg	10.3
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Cheow Hin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(64%)	64%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	615,578.67	87,939.817 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage 25 Sep 2017 Ng Huat Seng (Appellant)Lost	25 Sep 2017	Ng Huat Seng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellants were ordered to pay costs of $35,000 to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage 21 Jun 2016 Ng Huat Seng (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jun 2016	Ng Huat Seng (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal fixed at $10,000 as well as reasonable disbursements.
3	Viknesh Dairy Farm v Balakrishnan: Mandatory Injunction, Fraud, Agency, and Earth Dumping Dispute 27 Jan 2015 SINGLAND TRANSPORTATION PTE LTD (Defendant)Won	27 Jan 2015	SINGLAND TRANSPORTATION PTE LTD (Defendant): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application against the second defendant for a mandatory injunction is dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Store+Deliver+Logistics v Chin Siew Gim: Architect Negligence & Breach of Contract in Warehouse Construction 26 Apr 2012 Chin Siew Gim (trading as S G Chin and Associates) (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2012	Chin Siew Gim (trading as S G Chin and Associates) (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against the defendant in the amount of $99,501.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Econ Piling v GTE Construction: Dispute over Retention Sum and Joint Venture Agreement 22 Sep 2009 Econ Piling Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	22 Sep 2009	Econ Piling Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJudgment for Econ Piling in the sum of $516,077.67 together with interest thereon at the court rate from the date of the writ to the date of payment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Econ Corp Ltd v Econ-NCC JV: Dispute over Equipment Supply for Mass Transit System Construction 11 Nov 2008 Econ Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Nov 2008	Econ Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal and of the defendant’s application below awarded to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	W&P Piling v Chew Yin What: Directors' Duties & Asset Transfers 30 Jul 2007 Yeung Chun Keung (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2007	Yeung Chun Keung (Defendant): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment awarded against the defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Entitled to 75% contribution from the other two defendants.
8	Noor Azizan v Tan Lip Chin: Effect of Syariah Court Divorce on Women's Charter Marriage 11 Jul 2006 Noor Azizan bte Colony (alias Noor Azizan bte Mohamed Noor) (Plaintiff)Won	11 Jul 2006	Noor Azizan bte Colony (alias Noor Azizan bte Mohamed Noor) (Plaintiff): Declaration GrantedThe court declared that the Syariah Court’s decree on 30 November 2004 dissolved the entire marriage relationship between Mdm Noor Azizan and Mr Tan.
9	Liquidator of W&P Piling v Chew Yin What: Private Examination under Companies Act 27 May 2004 Yeung Chun Keung (Respondent)Won	27 May 2004	Yeung Chun Keung (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication against the third respondent dismissed with costs.
10	Elis Tjoa v United Overseas Bank: Forgery, Bank's Duty of Care & Contractual Terms 01 Jan 2003 Elis Tjoa (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jan 2003	Elis Tjoa (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Fu Hai Construction v Econ Corporation: Misrepresentation & Construction Subcontract Dispute 30 Aug 2002 Econ Corporation Limited (Defendant)Lost	30 Aug 2002	Econ Corporation Limited (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	John While Springs v Goh Sai Chuah: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Business Diversion 02 May 2001 Koh Kok Eng (Defendant)Neutral	02 May 2001	Koh Kok Eng (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this defendant in the provided text.
13	John While Springs (S) Pte Ltd v Goh: Winding Up Petition Based on Just and Equitable Ground 21 Mar 2001 Ng Wan Wha (Petitioner)Lost	21 Mar 2001	Ng Wan Wha (Petitioner): Petition dismissedThe petition to wind up Segno Precision Pte Ltd was dismissed.