Tan Cheow Hung

Tan Cheow Hung is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking and finance and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Practising certificate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Cheow Hung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Cheow Hung has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Keystone Law Corporation	2 cases	40% of cases	Yap Guat Beng v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Guidelines for Bankrupts Managing Companies(Dec 2010) Law Society of Singapore v Mahadevan Lukshumayeh: Practicing as Advocate and Solicitor Without Valid Practicing Certificate(Jul 2008)
Assomull & Partners	1 cases	20% of cases	Pushpavalli v Shanmuga Nathan: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce(Nov 2000)
Y F Tan & Co	1 cases	20% of cases	Standard Chartered Bank v Elang Mas: Mortgage, Banking Facilities & Default(Aug 2003)
Beacon Law Corporation	1 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ganesan Sivasankar: Fatal Road Accident, Rash Act Causing Death(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Cheow Hung's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Cheow Hung's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Ganesan Sivasankar: Fatal Road Accident, Rash Act Causing Death 20 Jul 2017 Ganesan Sivasankar (Respondent)Lost	20 Jul 2017	Ganesan Sivasankar (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe imprisonment term was enhanced from 12 weeks to five months.
2	Yap Guat Beng v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Guidelines for Bankrupts Managing Companies 07 Dec 2010 Yap Guat Beng (Appellant)Won	07 Dec 2010	Yap Guat Beng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; sentences reduced to fines.
3	Law Society of Singapore v Mahadevan Lukshumayeh: Practicing as Advocate and Solicitor Without Valid Practicing Certificate 07 Jul 2008 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	07 Jul 2008	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Order to show cause grantedThe Law Society's application for an order to show cause was granted, and the respondents were prohibited from applying for a practicing certificate for a specified period. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Standard Chartered Bank v Elang Mas: Mortgage, Banking Facilities & Default 22 Aug 2003 Omnilite Investment & Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	22 Aug 2003	Omnilite Investment & Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar was dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis.
5	Pushpavalli v Shanmuga Nathan: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 13 Nov 2000 Pushpavalli d/o Govindaraju (Appellant)Partial	13 Nov 2000	Pushpavalli d/o Govindaraju (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, varying the order relating to maintenance. The lump sum award is set aside and a monthly sum of $200 shall be paid with effect from 1 October 1999. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.