Standard Chartered Bank v Elang Mas: Mortgage, Banking Facilities & Default
In Standard Chartered Bank v Elang Mas Enterprise Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore dismissed the defendants' appeal against a Senior Assistant Registrar's decision. The decision ordered the delivery of possession of two properties to Standard Chartered Bank and payment of sums owed under banking facilities. The court found the defendants' claims of wrongful termination of facilities and undue influence to be without merit, upholding the bank's right to terminate the facilities due to breaches of conditions and the 'uncommitted' nature of the facilities. The court also found that the defendants had failed to raise their grievances promptly and had not established a valid counterclaim.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal dismissed. Concerns a default on banking facilities and mortgages, leading to a possession order for Standard Chartered Bank.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard Chartered Bank | Plaintiff | Corporation | Appeal dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis | Won | Lee Eng Beng, Lynette Koh |
Elang Mas Enterprise Pte Ltd | Defendant, Appellant | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Lost | Tan Cheow Hung |
Omnilite Investment & Trading Pte Ltd | Defendant, Appellant | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Lost | Tan Cheow Hung |
Mira Nathania Halim | Defendant, Appellant | Individual | Appeal Dismissed | Lost | Vivian Chew |
Indah Nathania Tantio | Defendant, Appellant | Individual | Appeal Dismissed | Lost | Vivian Chew |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
MPH Rubin | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Lee Eng Beng | Rajah & Tann |
Lynette Koh | Rajah & Tann |
Tan Cheow Hung | Y F Tan & Co |
Vivian Chew | Assomull & Partners |
4. Facts
- Standard Chartered Bank granted banking facilities to Elang Mas Enterprise Pte Ltd and Omnilite Investment & Trading Pte Ltd.
- The facilities were secured by mortgages over properties owned by Elang Mas Enterprise Pte Ltd.
- Mira Nathania Halim and Indah Nathania Tantio provided guarantees for the facilities.
- The facility letters stipulated that the facilities were subject to review and could be revised, reduced, or cancelled by the plaintiffs at their sole discretion.
- The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants defaulted on their payment obligations.
- The plaintiffs terminated the banking facilities and demanded payment of the outstanding sums.
- The plaintiffs applied for and obtained an order for the delivery of possession of the mortgaged properties.
5. Formal Citations
- Standard Chartered Bank v Elang Mas Enterprise Pte Ltd and Others, OS 1541/2002, [2003] SGHC 181
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Plaintiffs granted second defendants overdraft facility of USD50,000 and a Trade facility of USD200,000. | |
Plaintiffs sent letter of offer to first defendants for term loan facility. | |
Plaintiffs increased the Trade facility to USD1,400,000. | |
Third and fourth defendants provided letters of guarantee for the first and second facilities. | |
Plaintiffs incorporated additional terms to the letter of offer dated 3 April 2000. | |
Plaintiffs sent second letter of offer to first defendants restructuring the facility granted under the first letter of offer. | |
Plaintiffs further increased the Trade facility to USD2,000,000. | |
Plaintiffs allegedly stopped all credit facilities to the second defendants. | |
First and second defendants mortgaged the properties to the plaintiffs. | |
Plaintiffs demanded payment from the first defendants. | |
Plaintiffs prepared an Early Alert Report. | |
Plaintiffs filed application to court. | |
Senior Assistant Registrar ordered delivery of possession of properties to plaintiffs. | |
Defendants allegedly placed protests on record in relation to the termination of the loan facilities. | |
Third defendant filed affidavit. | |
Appeal by the defendants was dismissed with costs. |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to terminate the facilities when they perceived that their securities were threatened.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Wrongful termination of housing loan
- Wrongful termination of credit facilities
- Undue Influence
- Outcome: The court found that the defendants did not establish the principles stated in Malaysian French Bank as well as National Westminster Bank Plc cases.
- Category: Substantive
- Compliance with Order 83 of the Rules of Court
- Outcome: The court held that the plaintiffs had provided the defendants with all the requisite particulars and in any event, the conclusive evidence clause in the facility documents precluded the defendants from arguing that they were not liable to the plaintiffs for the amounts stated and that the statements of outstandings were wrong.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Possession of Mortgaged Properties
- Payment of Outstanding Sums
- Costs
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
- Enforcement of Mortgage
- Enforcement of Guarantee
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Banking Litigation
- Mortgage Enforcement
11. Industries
- Banking
- Finance
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd Kuala Trengganu v Mae Perkayayuan Sdn Bhd & Anor | High Court of Malaysia | Yes | [1993] 2 CLJ 495 | Malaysia | Distinguished from the present case because the facility letters in the present case contained terms that the facilities were 'uncommitted' and could be revised, reduced or cancelled by the plaintiffs at their 'sole discretion without notice'. |
Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia Ltd | High Court of Australia | Yes | (1935) 53 CLR 643 | Australia | Cited for the principle that a certificate issued by a bank under the conclusive evidence clause is determinative of the amount due to the bank, in the absence of fraud or manifest error. |
Bangkok Bank Ltd v Cheng Lip Kwong | High Court of Singapore | Yes | [1989] SLR 1154 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that a certificate issued by a bank under the conclusive evidence clause is determinative of the amount due to the bank, in the absence of fraud or manifest error. |
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd v The Timekeeper Singapore Pte Ltd & Ors | High Court of Singapore | Yes | [1997] 2 SLR 526 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that a certificate issued by a bank under the conclusive evidence clause is determinative of the amount due to the bank, in the absence of fraud or manifest error. |
Malaysian French Bank Bhd v Abdullah bin Mohd Yusof & Ors | Supreme Court of Malaysia | Yes | [1991] 2 MLJ 475 | Malaysia | Cited for the principle that to succeed in a defence of undue influence, the defendants must establish that the plaintiff was in a position to dominate the defendants’ will and thus obtained an unfair advantage by using that position. |
National Westminster Bank Plc v Morgan | House of Lords | Yes | [1985] 1 AC 686 | United Kingdom | Cited for the principle that before a transaction can be set aside for undue influence, it has to be shown that the transaction has been wrongful in that it has constituted a manifest and unfair disadvantage to the person seeking to avoid it. |
Eng Mee Yong & Ors v Letchumanan | Privy Council | Yes | [1979] 2 MLJ 212 | Malaysia | Cited for the court's approach to conflicting evidence in affidavits. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Order 83 of the Rules of Court |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Land Titles Act (Cap 157) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Banking Facilities
- Mortgage
- Guarantee
- Default
- Termination
- Uncommitted Facilities
- Conclusive Evidence Clause
- Undue Influence
- Early Alert Report
15.2 Keywords
- mortgage
- banking facilities
- default
- Standard Chartered Bank
- Elang Mas
- Singapore
- appeal
- possession order
16. Subjects
- Banking
- Mortgages
- Finance
- Civil Litigation
17. Areas of Law
- Banking Law
- Mortgage Law
- Contract Law
- Civil Procedure