Tan Hong Liang

Tan Hong Liang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in evidence and without prejudice privilege.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hong Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Hong Liang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
JWS Asia Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	CSO v CSP: Without Prejudice Privilege & Admissibility of Evidence in Settlement Negotiations(Feb 2023)
Kenneth Tan Partnership	1 cases	50% of cases	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification(Dec 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Hong Liang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Hong Liang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CSO v CSP: Without Prejudice Privilege & Admissibility of Evidence in Settlement Negotiations 07 Feb 2023 CSQ (Defendant, Respondent)Neutral	07 Feb 2023	CSQ (Defendant, Respondent): NeutralThe outcome for the second defendant is neutral as the dispute primarily concerns the first defendant.
2	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification 27 Dec 2004 Hub Warrior Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Dec 2004	Hub Warrior Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for damages and rectification was dismissed with costs.