Tan Jin Yong

Tan Jin Yong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and construction law. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Transfer	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jin Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Jin Yong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	6 cases	100% of cases	Pure Group v Siong Ann Engineering: Dispute over Ramp Works Contract and Payment Milestones(Oct 2023) Elcarim Science v Zhang Yongtai: Director's Duties, Share Transfer & Breach of Contract(Aug 2023) Siong Ann Engineering v Pure Group: Contract Formation Dispute over Ramp Works(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Jin Yong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	53.6 parties avg	3.6	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Jin Yong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	148,180.00	24,696.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pure Group v Siong Ann Engineering: Dispute over Ramp Works Contract and Payment Milestones 03 Oct 2023 Siong Ann Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2023	Siong Ann Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed in favour of the respondent. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Elcarim Science v Zhang Yongtai: Director's Duties, Share Transfer & Breach of Contract 14 Aug 2023 Zhang Yongtai (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	14 Aug 2023	Zhang Yongtai (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed for $11,000 for wrongful termination. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Siong Ann Engineering v Pure Group: Contract Formation Dispute over Ramp Works 03 Apr 2022 Siong Ann Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	03 Apr 2022	Siong Ann Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the respondent is ordered to pay the appellant $130,180.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Trustee v. Soon Kiat: Adjudication Application Delay & Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 05 Oct 2020 Trustee of the estate of Tay Choon Huat, deceased (Plaintiff)Won	05 Oct 2020	Trustee of the estate of Tay Choon Huat, deceased (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe plaintiff's application to set aside the adjudication determination was successful, and costs were awarded to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Beng Nga v Yat Guan Pte Ltd: Share Transfer Dispute over Pre-emption Clause 22 Mar 2020 Lim Er Luen (Defendant)Won	22 Mar 2020	Lim Er Luen (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs of S$7,000 awarded against the Plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	China Railway v Zhao Yang: SOPA & Performance Bond Proceeds Dispute 21 May 2019 China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co Ltd Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Won	21 May 2019	China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co Ltd Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Application to set aside the adjudication determination allowedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination allowed.