Tan Kai Liang

Tan Kai Liang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in natural justice and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 36% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated expertise across 117 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Application	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression Remedy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors' Liabilities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disqualification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effect of bankruptcy on directorship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative Actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Debt Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tort of conspiracy to injure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-solicitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Springboard injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholding Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cross-border disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder's Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
E-discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wealth Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mediation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negotiation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kai Liang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	14 cases	100% of cases	Hall v Rapyd: Without Prejudice Privilege & Oral Admission of Liability in Commission Dispute(Feb 2024) Chen Aun-Li Andrew v Ha Chi Kut: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA(Nov 2022) Baker v SPH Interactive: Minority Oppression & Conspiracy in Tech Co. Dispute(Sep 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kai Liang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 5 (36%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	14%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	21%
Won	93.3 parties avg	3.3	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2013	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2014	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kai Liang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(14%)	14%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Won	9(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	75,000.00	10,714.297 cases	7
USD	1,788,855.41	1,788,855.411 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hall v Rapyd: Without Prejudice Privilege & Oral Admission of Liability in Commission Dispute 22 Feb 2024 Rapyd Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	22 Feb 2024	Rapyd Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partParagraphs 22 and 36 of the SOC be struck out, with the exception of the communications stated at paragraph 22(a) of the SOC and as particularised in the Particulars.
2	Chen Aun-Li Andrew v Ha Chi Kut: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA 30 Nov 2022 Ha Chi Kut (suing as the sole executrix of the estate of Khoo Ee Liam, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	30 Nov 2022	Ha Chi Kut (suing as the sole executrix of the estate of Khoo Ee Liam, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; respondent awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Baker v SPH Interactive: Minority Oppression & Conspiracy in Tech Co. Dispute 25 Sep 2022 Barakat-Brown, Jason Lewis (Defendant)Won	25 Sep 2022	Barakat-Brown, Jason Lewis (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
4	Ha Chi Kut v Chen Aun-Li Andrew: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA 26 Jun 2022 Ha Chi Kut (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2022	Ha Chi Kut (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, Registration Order to stand. Costs fixed at S$8,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to Mdm Ha. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA 23 Mar 2020 Steep Rise Limited (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2020	Steep Rise Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Steep Rise Limited ordered to pay costs of $40,000 to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Jardine Lloyd Thompson v Howden: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty in Employee Defection 02 Aug 2015 Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Aug 2015	Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application Granted in PartApplication for interim injunctions granted in part; 'springboard' injunctions dismissed, but injunctions against disclosure of confidential information and solicitation of employees granted.
7	Chua Kok Tee David v DBS Bank: Fixed Deposit Dispute and Bank's Record-Keeping Practices 30 Jul 2015 DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2015	DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.
8	Tiananmen KTV v Furama: Interim Injunction for Tenancy Agreements Dispute 26 Mar 2015 Furama Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	26 Mar 2015	Furama Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts awarded to the defendant fixed at $7,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of Arrangement 15 May 2014 Beloff Michael Jacob QC (Respondent)Lost	15 May 2014	Beloff Michael Jacob QC (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeals against the decision to admit Mr. Beloff were allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Deutsche Bank v Chang: Negligence, Fiduciary Duty & Misrepresentation in Accumulator Investments 18 Sep 2013 Deutsche Bank AG (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	18 Sep 2013	Deutsche Bank AG (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partJudgment for Deutsche Bank for US$1,788,855.41 plus interest. Assumed USD, as the contract sum was in USD.
11	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice 16 Sep 2013 Beloff Michael Jacob QC (Applicant)Won	16 Sep 2013	Beloff Michael Jacob QC (Applicant): Application AllowedThe application for ad hoc admission was allowed.
12	Chan Kin Foo v City Developments Ltd: Collective Sale, Constitutional Rights & Property Ownership 13 Mar 2013 City Developments Ltd (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2013	City Developments Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; City Developments Ltd was awarded $20,000 in costs plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Nathan Edmund v Law Society: Application for Reinstatement to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 20 Nov 2012 Nathan Edmund (Applicant)Won	20 Nov 2012	Nathan Edmund (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for reinstatement to the roll of advocates and solicitors was allowed, subject to conditions proposed by the Law Society.
14	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim Dismissed 15 May 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Defendant)Won	15 May 2012	PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Defendant): Action DismissedPlaintiff's action against PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was dismissed.