Tan Kon Yeng Eugene

Tan Kon Yeng Eugene is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Frustration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sand Ban	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete (RMC)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kon Yeng Eugene has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Sand Ban, Frustration of Contract & RMC Supply(Jul 2013) Holcim v Precise Development: Force Majeure & Indonesian Sand Ban Impact on Concrete Supply(Jan 2011) Precise Development v Holcim: Dispute over Concrete Supply Contract due to Indonesian Sand Ban(Nov 2009)
CLASIS LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute(Dec 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kon Yeng Eugene's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kon Yeng Eugene's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute 22 Dec 2022 Precise Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Dec 2022	Precise Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant.
2	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Sand Ban, Frustration of Contract & RMC Supply 04 Jul 2013 Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Jul 2013	Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendant's counterclaim for losses due to the plaintiff's breach of contract was allowed; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Holcim v Precise Development: Force Majeure & Indonesian Sand Ban Impact on Concrete Supply 18 Jan 2011 Precise Development Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	18 Jan 2011	Precise Development Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Precise Development v Holcim: Dispute over Concrete Supply Contract due to Indonesian Sand Ban 16 Nov 2009 Precise Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Nov 2009	Precise Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiffInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff, with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
5	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages 08 Apr 2008 Wishing Star Ltd (Appellant)Partial	08 Apr 2008	Wishing Star Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with regard to the award which the Judge made for damages claimed under item (a).