Tan Pei Han

Tan Pei Han is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and recourse against award. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Pei Han has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and separability.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Separability	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Waiver of objections	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness and Proportionality	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Apparent Authority	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Pei Han has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Reliance Infrastructure v. Shanghai Electric: Arbitration Award Challenge Based on Alleged Forgery(Dec 2024) Reliance Infrastructure v Shanghai Electric: SICC Rules on Costs Assessment(Apr 2024) Reliance Infrastructure v. Shanghai Electric: Forgery & Authority in Arbitration(Jan 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Pei Han's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Pei Han's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	160,000.00	80,000.002 cases	2
USD	734,660.02	734,660.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Reliance Infrastructure v. Shanghai Electric: Arbitration Award Challenge Based on Alleged Forgery 16 Dec 2024 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Respondent)Won	16 Dec 2024	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Appellant must pay the Respondent costs of USD 160,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Reliance Infrastructure v Shanghai Electric: SICC Rules on Costs Assessment 15 Apr 2024 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2024	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant): Costs AwardedShanghai Electric was awarded costs in the amount of US$734,660.02, a reduction from the costs claimed by them of US$911,244.87.
3	Reliance Infrastructure v. Shanghai Electric: Forgery & Authority in Arbitration 30 Jan 2024 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jan 2024	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts awarded to Shanghai Electric. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.