Tan Spring

Tan Spring is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and injunctions. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Spring has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Performance Bonds	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Incomplete Gifts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Spring has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Spring has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Withers KhattarWong LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Shanghai Chong Kee v Church of St Teresa: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call(Jan 2024) WDS v WDT: Dispute over US$1.5 Million Gift to Deceased's Daughter(May 2022)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Overseas Union Enterprise Ltd v Three Sixty Degree Pte Ltd: Lease Dispute over Fire Safety Certificate and Occupancy Load(Mar 2013)
KhattarWong	1 cases	25% of cases	Chia Foong Lin v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Dispute over Kerb Wall, Gate, Parking & Use of Private Road(Dec 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Spring's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.5 parties avg	2.5	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Spring's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	22,000.00	11,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shanghai Chong Kee v Church of St Teresa: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call 10 Jan 2024 Church of St Teresa (Defendant)Won	10 Jan 2024	Church of St Teresa (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Costs were ordered for the defendant in the amount of $22,000 (excluding disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	WDS v WDT: Dispute over US$1.5 Million Gift to Deceased's Daughter 24 May 2022 WDT (Defendant)Lost	24 May 2022	WDT (Defendant): Claim DismissedWDT does not have a valid claim against the Deceased’s estate for the sum of US$1.5 million to be paid to her prior to the distribution of the estate.
3	Overseas Union Enterprise Ltd v Three Sixty Degree Pte Ltd: Lease Dispute over Fire Safety Certificate and Occupancy Load 27 Mar 2013 Three Sixty Degree Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Mar 2013	Three Sixty Degree Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed; Three Sixty's cross-claim against OUE asserted by way of counterclaim in these proceedings fails entirely. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chia Foong Lin v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Dispute over Kerb Wall, Gate, Parking & Use of Private Road 11 Dec 2011 Wee Siew Bock (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Dec 2011	Wee Siew Bock (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).