Tan Tian Luh

Tan Tian Luh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and civil practice. Their track record shows a 41.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 18% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated expertise across 77 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutes and regulations	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reliance Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Claims by sub-contractor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jet Grout Pile Method	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measurement of Construction Work	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonoured Cheque	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Capital Reduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tian Luh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Tian Luh has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chancery Law Corporation	16 cases	73% of cases	DKT v DKU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Nov 2024) Civil Tech v Hua Rong: Security of Payment Act & Cross-Contract Set-Offs(Mar 2018) Hua Rong Engineering v Civil Tech: Security of Payment Act & Cross-Contract Set-Off(Jul 2017)
Helen Yeo & Partners	4 cases	18% of cases	Beaufort Sentosa: Capital Reduction via Preference Share Cancellation under Companies Act(Aug 2001) Yap Boon Sim v Dr Lee Meng Kuan: Locus Standi in Medical Negligence Claim Under Civil Law Act(Nov 2000) Re Boonann Construction: Judicial Management, Mortgage Redemption, and Interest Accrual(Jul 2000)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	5% of cases	Sunlink Engineering v Koru Bena: Transfer of Case from High Court to Subordinate Courts for Enforcement in Malaysia(May 2003)
Tan and Tan Partnership	1 cases	5% of cases	Lim Chi Szu Margaret v Risis Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal in Interlocutory Judgment(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Tian Luh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 4 (18%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	26.0 parties avg	6.0	9%
Lost	92.3 parties avg	2.3	41%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	9%
Won	92.7 parties avg	2.7	41%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2001	11.0 parties avg	1.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	34.7 parties avg	4.7
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2017	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Tian Luh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(9%)	9%
Lost	9(41%)	41%
Partial	2(9%)	9%
Won	9(41%)	41%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,000.00	1,000.0013 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 2 cases (66.7%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DKT v DKU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 25 Nov 2024 DKT (Applicant)Lost	25 Nov 2024	DKT (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside arbitral award dismissed; DKT to pay DKU costs of SGD 55,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Civil Tech v Hua Rong: Security of Payment Act & Cross-Contract Set-Offs 01 Mar 2018 Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	01 Mar 2018	Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Civil Tech was not entitled to withhold payment based on claims arising under a separate construction contract. Costs awarded to the respondent fixed at $15,000 with disbursements of $400 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hua Rong Engineering v Civil Tech: Security of Payment Act & Cross-Contract Set-Off 23 Jul 2017 Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	23 Jul 2017	Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application to set aside the adjudication determination dismissedThe Defendant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Metropole Pte Ltd v Designshop Pte Ltd: Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act Dispute 06 Mar 2017 Metropole Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	06 Mar 2017	Metropole Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedMetropole's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs of $11,000 plus disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Rong Shun Engineering v C.P. Ong Construction: Security of Payment Act Dispute 27 Feb 2017 C.P. Ong Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	27 Feb 2017	C.P. Ong Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Partial LossPart of the adjudication determination was set aside, but the respondent still has to pay $366,507.96 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Bumi Geo Engineering v Civil Tech: Construction Sub-Contract Dispute over Payment for Ground Improvement Works 11 Oct 2015 Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	11 Oct 2015	Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed due to evidential shortcomings.
7	Seah Teong Kang v Seah Yong Chwan: Testamentary Gift of Shares, Winding Up, and Section 259 of the Companies Act 09 Sep 2015 Seah Chiew Tee (Appellant)Lost	09 Sep 2015	Seah Chiew Tee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
8	Chancery Law Corp v MCST No 1024: Contentious Business Agreement Dispute 12 Mar 2015 Chancery Law Corp (Applicant, Appellant)Won	12 Mar 2015	Chancery Law Corp (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; third party notice set aside. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Fu Loong v Mok: Chairperson's Powers & Subsidiary Proprietors' Rights in Strata Management 22 May 2014 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1024 (Respondent)Partial	22 May 2014	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1024 (Respondent): Appeal Partially UnsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful; rulings on Motions 8 and 9 invalidated; rejection of Contested Votes on Motion 2 invalidated; direction on amendments to Motions 1(b) and 1(e) set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Lee Koon v Seah Yong Chwan: Specific Bequest of Company Shares & Liquidation Surplus Dispute 29 Dec 2013 Lee Koon (by her attorneys Seah Teong Kang and Seah Chiew Tee) (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Dec 2013	Lee Koon (by her attorneys Seah Teong Kang and Seah Chiew Tee) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that the liquidation surplus should fall into the residuary estate was dismissed.
11	Fu Loong v Mok: Invalidating MCST Chairperson Rulings on Motions at General Meeting 27 Oct 2013 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1024 (Defendant)Dismissed	27 Oct 2013	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1024 (Defendant): Application dismissed in partThe Plaintiffs’ application to invalidate the 1st Defendant’s ruling on Motions 3(a), 3(b), 8 and 9 are validated; the other orders sought by the Plaintiffs were refused.
12	Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute over HDB Flat 09 May 2013 Low Kian Beng Lawrence (administrator of the estate of Tan Ah Kng, deceased) (Defendant)Lost	09 May 2013	Low Kian Beng Lawrence (administrator of the estate of Tan Ah Kng, deceased) (Defendant): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal against the refusal to strike out the claim was dismissed.
13	Shanghai Construction v Tan: Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration in Construction Subcontract Dispute 26 Jul 2012 Tan Poo Seng (Defendant)Won	26 Jul 2012	Tan Poo Seng (Defendant): Stay GrantedStay of proceedings granted in favor of the defendant.
14	Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence: Proprietary Estoppel & Housing Development Act 04 Aug 2011 Low Kian Beng Lawrence (administrator of the estate of Tan Ah Kng, deceased) (Defendant)Lost	04 Aug 2011	Low Kian Beng Lawrence (administrator of the estate of Tan Ah Kng, deceased) (Defendant): Application to Strike Out DismissedThe Defendant's application to strike out the Plaintiff's statement of claim was dismissed.
15	Panin International Credit v Ngan Ching Wen: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Moneylender's Action 09 Nov 2010 Ngan Ching Wen (Appellant)Won	09 Nov 2010	Ngan Ching Wen (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Ngan awarded costs of S$3,000 from Panin. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Tentat Singapore v Multiple Granite: Legal Advice Privilege & Waiver in Loan Dispute 19 Aug 2008 Tentat Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Aug 2008	Tentat Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application GrantedPlaintiff's application was granted, and the first and second defendants were ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
17	Lim Chi Szu Margaret v Risis Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal in Interlocutory Judgment 30 Oct 2005 Risis Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Oct 2005	Risis Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to Strike Out GrantedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's application for leave to appeal was granted.
18	Sunlink Engineering v Koru Bena: Transfer of Case from High Court to Subordinate Courts for Enforcement in Malaysia 29 May 2003 Koru Bena Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	29 May 2003	Koru Bena Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal to transfer the case to the Subordinate Courts was allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
19	Beaufort Sentosa: Capital Reduction via Preference Share Cancellation under Companies Act 13 Aug 2001 Beaufort Sentosa Development Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	13 Aug 2001	Beaufort Sentosa Development Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe application for an order approving the proposed reduction of share capital was allowed.
20	Yap Boon Sim v Dr Lee Meng Kuan: Locus Standi in Medical Negligence Claim Under Civil Law Act 28 Nov 2000 Another (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2000	Another (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowedThe defendant's appeal against the assistant registrar's decision was dismissed.
21	Re Boonann Construction: Judicial Management, Mortgage Redemption, and Interest Accrual 05 Jul 2000 Bank of Singapore (Respondent)Won	05 Jul 2000	Bank of Singapore (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court ordered the company to pay the legal costs of the bank in connection with the application which was fixed at $800 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Re Boonann Construction: Judicial Management, Mortgage Redemption & Interest Owed 05 Jul 2000 Bank of Singapore (Respondent)Won	05 Jul 2000	Bank of Singapore (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court authorized the payment to the bank of all sums due and payable under the mortgage, inclusive of interest, up to the date of payment. The judicial managers’ costs of the application were fixed at $1,200 and provided that these should be paid out of the assets of the company (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).