Tan Ting Wei

Tan Ting Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and guaranteed maximum price contract. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in waiver and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Waiver	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offer	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Delay in completion	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Consideration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ting Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Ting Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Construction Contract Dispute over Preliminaries, Performance Bond, Shared Savings & Project Delays(Jan 2019) Marty Ltd v Hualon Corp: Arbitration Agreement, Repudiation & Waiver(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Ting Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Ting Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Construction Contract Dispute over Preliminaries, Performance Bond, Shared Savings & Project Delays 10 Jan 2019 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	10 Jan 2019	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Partial JudgmentCounterclaim for share of shared savings allowed; liable for general damages for 133 days of delays in the completion of the Project; claim for a refund of the portion of the additional preliminaries it paid to the defendant for 133 days of delay only allowed.
2	Marty Ltd v Hualon Corp: Arbitration Agreement, Repudiation & Waiver 09 Oct 2018 Marty Limited (Appellant)Won	09 Oct 2018	Marty Limited (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the orders below, including the costs order, made by the Judge are set aside.