Tan Tse Hsien

Tan Tse Hsien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in recourse against award and setting aside. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collateral Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination without notice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Tse Hsien has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PK Wong & Nair LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	CZT v CZU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract(Nov 2023) CZT v CZU: Production of Arbitral Tribunal Deliberation Records in Setting Aside Application(Jun 2023) Höptner v Three Fins: Wrongful Dismissal Claim over Termination Bonus & Unauthorised Relocation(Feb 2025)
Advocatus Law LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	First Asia Capital Investments Ltd v Société Générale: Collateral Contracts & Misrepresentation(Apr 2017)
Nair & Co LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Ozak Seiko Co Ltd v Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd: Derivative Action & Director's Duties(Jan 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Tse Hsien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Tse Hsien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	400,000.00	400,000.001 cases	1
USD	85,795.95	85,795.951 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Höptner v Three Fins: Wrongful Dismissal Claim over Termination Bonus & Unauthorised Relocation 18 Feb 2025 Three Fins Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	18 Feb 2025	Three Fins Pte Ltd (Defendant): Consent Judgment for DefendantConsent judgment in the sum of US$85,795.95 in favour of the defendant on its counterclaim.
2	CZT v CZU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract 26 Nov 2023 CZT (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Nov 2023	CZT (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
3	CZT v CZU: Production of Arbitral Tribunal Deliberation Records in Setting Aside Application 27 Jun 2023 CZT (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jun 2023	CZT (Plaintiff): Summonses DismissedPlaintiff's applications for production of the records of deliberations from the arbitral tribunal were dismissed.
4	Ozak Seiko Co Ltd v Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd: Derivative Action & Director's Duties 29 Jan 2019 Tan Hock Seng (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	29 Jan 2019	Tan Hock Seng (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedTan Hock Seng's application for leave to defend the derivative action was dismissed.
5	First Asia Capital Investments Ltd v Société Générale: Collateral Contracts & Misrepresentation 11 Apr 2017 Société Générale Bank & Trust (Defendant)Won	11 Apr 2017	Société Générale Bank & Trust (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; costs awarded in the amount of $400,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).