Tan Tse Hsien Bryan

Tan Tse Hsien Bryan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and schemes of arrangement. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated expertise across 68 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	7 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trustee Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trustee Powers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collateral Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual entitlements upon termination of employment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third party liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Classification of creditors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Prosecution of Civil Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Tse Hsien Bryan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PK Wong & Nair LLC	5 cases	42% of cases	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Breach of Warranty, Damages, and Interest in Letter of Indemnity Dispute(Jun 2024) Yap Sze Kam v Yang Kee Logistics: Judicial Management vs. Bondholder Rights(Feb 2023) Thillainathan Aravinthan v EMC: Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation in Employment Termination(Dec 2021)
Straits Law Practice LLC	3 cases	25% of cases	Lai Hoon Woon v Lai Foong Sin: Testamentary Capacity, Constructive Trusts, Resulting Trusts(Jun 2016) Jayanti Nadarajoo v Bronwyn Matthews: Share Valuation Dispute under Companies Act(Aug 2015) Lim Kok Lian v Lee Patricia: Striking Out Counterclaims for Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process, and Conspiracy(Dec 2014)
Nair & Co LLC	3 cases	25% of cases	Pathfinder Strategic Credit LP v Empire Capital Resources: Scheme of Arrangement & Disclosure(Apr 2019) Goldilocks Investment Co Ltd v Noble Group Ltd: Interim Injunction & Shareholder Rights under SFA(May 2018) Empire Capital Resources: Scheme of Arrangement, Release of Claims Against Third Parties(Feb 2018)
Advocatus Law LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Living the Link v Tan Lay Tin: Unfair Preferences & Director's Duties in Insolvency(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Tse Hsien Bryan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	116.0 parties avg	16.0	8%
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	44.7 parties avg	4.7	33%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	116.0 parties avg	16.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Tse Hsien Bryan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Lost	3(25%)	25%
Partial	4(33%)	33%
Won	4(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,318,851.33	1,263,770.275 cases	5
USD	10,319,910.31	10,319,910.311 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Breach of Warranty, Damages, and Interest in Letter of Indemnity Dispute 06 Jun 2024 Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank, Singapore Branch (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	06 Jun 2024	Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank, Singapore Branch (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partJudgment for Crédit Agricole for breach of warranty in the amount of US$10,319,910.31.
2	Yap Sze Kam v Yang Kee Logistics: Judicial Management vs. Bondholder Rights 23 Feb 2023 Yap Sze Kam (Applicant)Dismissed	23 Feb 2023	Yap Sze Kam (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for judicial management order dismissed.
3	Thillainathan Aravinthan v EMC: Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation in Employment Termination 16 Dec 2021 EMC Information Systems Management Ltd Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	16 Dec 2021	EMC Information Systems Management Ltd Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
4	CIMB Bank v World Fuel Services: Debenture Authenticity & Right of Set-Off Dispute 04 Mar 2021 World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	04 Mar 2021	World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; WFS to receive costs of $32,000 for both appeals (CA 107/2020 and CA 130/2020) from CIMB. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	OCBC vs KS Energy: Interim Judicial Management under IRDA for Insolvency 17 Sep 2020 KS Drilling Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	17 Sep 2020	KS Drilling Pte Ltd (Respondent): Interim Judicial Management OrderedThe respondent was placed under interim judicial management.
6	Pathfinder Strategic Credit LP v Empire Capital Resources: Scheme of Arrangement & Disclosure 29 Apr 2019 Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant)Lost	29 Apr 2019	Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant): Appeal dismissedThe court dismissed the appeal by Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd.
7	Goldilocks Investment Co Ltd v Noble Group Ltd: Interim Injunction & Shareholder Rights under SFA 06 May 2018 Goldilocks Investment Company Limited (Applicant)Won	06 May 2018	Goldilocks Investment Company Limited (Applicant): Injunction GrantedInterim injunction granted on modified terms, limited to the holding of Noble’s annual general meeting.
8	Empire Capital Resources: Scheme of Arrangement, Release of Claims Against Third Parties 18 Feb 2018 Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	18 Feb 2018	Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd (Applicant): Leave granted for scheme meeting to be calledLeave granted for the scheme meeting to be called, but with separate classes for the two sets of noteholders.
9	Lai Hoon Woon v Lai Foong Sin: Testamentary Capacity, Constructive Trusts, Resulting Trusts 13 Jun 2016 Low Kim Thai @ Liew Kim Eng (Defendant)Lost	13 Jun 2016	Low Kim Thai @ Liew Kim Eng (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim Dismissed; All of the second defendant's counterclaims are dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Living the Link v Tan Lay Tin: Unfair Preferences & Director's Duties in Insolvency 20 Apr 2016 Leow Quek Shiong (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Apr 2016	Leow Quek Shiong (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The liquidators were successful in reversing some of the impugned transactions. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Jayanti Nadarajoo v Bronwyn Matthews: Share Valuation Dispute under Companies Act 26 Aug 2015 AVONDALE GRAMMAR SCHOOL PTE. LTD. (Defendant)Won	26 Aug 2015	AVONDALE GRAMMAR SCHOOL PTE. LTD. (Defendant): Application grantedApplication to reduce share capital granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Lim Kok Lian v Lee Patricia: Striking Out Counterclaims for Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process, and Conspiracy 22 Dec 2014 Peter Michael Lee Yong Pee (Respondent)Partial	22 Dec 2014	Peter Michael Lee Yong Pee (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partRegistrar's Appeals Nos 253 and 254 of 2014 are dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.