Tan Wei Ming

Tan Wei Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and contributory negligence. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 56% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res ipsa loquitur	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diving Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Investment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert Determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wei Ming has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong LLP	7 cases	78% of cases	Arnold William v Tanoto Shipyard: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Duty of Care in Diving Accident(May 2016) Haneda Construction v Huttons Asia: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Property Sale(Nov 2015) Maryani Sadeli v Arjun Permanand Samtani: Equitable Compensation & Breach of Fiduciary Duties in Horizon Towers Collective Sale(Nov 2014)
Holborn Law LLC	2 cases	22% of cases	Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute(Nov 2023) Powercom Yuraku v Sunpower Semiconductor: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Singapore High Court(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wei Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.6
Complex Cases: 5 (56%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	45.4 parties avg	5.4	44%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	11%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	11%
Won	43.8 parties avg	3.8	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2014	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wei Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Won	4(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	326,200.00	54,366.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2014	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute 16 Nov 2023 Agile Accomm Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	16 Nov 2023	Agile Accomm Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application Opposed SuccessfullySuccessfully opposed the plaintiff's application, with costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Powercom Yuraku v Sunpower Semiconductor: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Singapore High Court 31 Aug 2022 Vijaykumar Kishinchand Amesur (Defendant)Neutral	31 Aug 2022	Vijaykumar Kishinchand Amesur (Defendant): No specific outcomeNo specific outcome was mentioned for the fourth defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Arnold William v Tanoto Shipyard: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Duty of Care in Diving Accident 05 May 2016 Tanoto Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	05 May 2016	Tanoto Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Haneda Construction v Huttons Asia: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Property Sale 11 Nov 2015 T Tanabakiyam (Defendant)Won	11 Nov 2015	T Tanabakiyam (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff to pay costs of $120,000 plus disbursements of $13,100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Maryani Sadeli v Arjun Permanand Samtani: Equitable Compensation & Breach of Fiduciary Duties in Horizon Towers Collective Sale 19 Nov 2014 Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent)Won	19 Nov 2014	Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent): Appeal DismissedCosts of $30,000 awarded against the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Teo Chong Nghee Patrick v Han Cheng Fong: Dispute Over Joint Venture & Wrongful Removal 22 May 2014 Cleantech Partners Hangzhou Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	22 May 2014	Cleantech Partners Hangzhou Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding the enforceability of the 1 March document.
7	BNJ v SMRT Trains: Negligence, Occupier's Liability, and Breach of Duty in MRT Accident 30 Dec 2013 Land Transport Authority of Singapore (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2013	Land Transport Authority of Singapore (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed.
8	Han Cheng Fong v Teo Chong Nghee Patrick: Wrongful Dismissal & Shareholders' Agreement Dispute 26 Feb 2013 Cleantech Partners Hangzhou Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	26 Feb 2013	Cleantech Partners Hangzhou Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the Defendant was not successful. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Cleantech Partners v Han Cheng Fong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy in Eco-Park Project 26 Feb 2013 Cleantech Partners Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Feb 2013	Cleantech Partners Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.