Tan Xian Ying

Tan Xian Ying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in adjudication and arbitration.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in adjudication and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Adjudication	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Reliance Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Xian Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Xian Ying has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chancery Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	DKT v DKU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Nov 2024) Metropole Pte Ltd v Designshop Pte Ltd: Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act Dispute(Mar 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Xian Ying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Xian Ying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	11,000.00	5,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DKT v DKU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 25 Nov 2024 DKT (Applicant)Lost	25 Nov 2024	DKT (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside arbitral award dismissed; DKT to pay DKU costs of SGD 55,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Metropole Pte Ltd v Designshop Pte Ltd: Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act Dispute 06 Mar 2017 Metropole Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	06 Mar 2017	Metropole Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedMetropole's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs of $11,000 plus disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.