Tan Yanying

Tan Yanying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 69.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Yanying has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	11 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unreasonable Behaviour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yanying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Yanying has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	85% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nur Azam: Drug Importation & Consumption Sentencing(Mar 2020) Public Prosecutor v Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Mar 2019) Public Prosecutor v Lingkesvaran Rajendaren: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2018)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	15% of cases	Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance(Jul 2012) AXC v AXD: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce(Jan 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Yanying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	23%
Won	92.4 parties avg	2.4	69%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Yanying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Partial	3(23%)	23%
Won	9(69%)	69%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	432,000.00	216,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nur Azam: Drug Importation & Consumption Sentencing 17 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
2	Public Prosecutor v Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah: Trafficking of Diamorphine 13 Mar 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Mar 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted of the charge.
3	Public Prosecutor v Lingkesvaran Rajendaren: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both Lingkesvaran Rajendaren and Alfian bin Abdul Rahim on charges of drug trafficking.
4	Public Prosecutor v S K Murugan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe accused was found guilty and convicted on the charge of trafficking diamorphine.
5	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Misuse of Drugs Act & Statutory Interpretation 04 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldConviction and sentence upheld.
6	PP v Mohamad Noor: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Nov 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Nov 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced.
7	Public Prosecutor v Zaini bin Mohamed Noor: Illegally Importing Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Jul 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Jul 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution proved the charge against Zaini beyond a reasonable doubt.
8	Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Feb 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	02 Feb 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialOne defendant sentenced to death, the other to life imprisonment.
9	Danabalan Balakrishnan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Trafficking Sentence 10 Apr 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Apr 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentence dismissed.
10	Muraligeran v PP: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal - Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Apr 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
11	PP v Ong Gim Hoo: Criminal Revision for Customs Act Offences & Amendment of Prior Convictions 03 Apr 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Dismissed	03 Apr 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Application dismissedThe Public Prosecutor's application to amend the respondent's previous convictions was dismissed.
12	Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance 30 Jul 2012 Quek Seow Kee (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	30 Jul 2012	Quek Seow Kee (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partSkeve shares are included in the pool of Matrimonial Assets. Husband to pay lump sum maintenance to wife.
13	AXC v AXD: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 18 Jan 2012 AXC (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Jan 2012	AXC (Plaintiff): Division of matrimonial assets and lump sum maintenance awardedLump sum maintenance of $432,000 awarded to the wife (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).