Public Prosecutor v Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah: Trafficking of Diamorphine

In the High Court of Singapore, Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah was found guilty of possessing not less than 21.25g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking, violating s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act. The court, presided over by Justice Hoo Sheau Peng, convicted Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah on 30 January 2019, and imposed the mandatory death sentence. The primary legal issue was whether the accused possessed the drugs with the intention of trafficking them. The court rejected the accused's claim that he intended to return the drugs, finding his intention was to deliver them.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Conviction and mandatory death sentence imposed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah was convicted of possessing diamorphine for trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The court found the charge proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
Tan Wee Hao of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Tan Yanying of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Lim Koon Eng JeremiahDefendantIndividualConviction and mandatory death sentence imposedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Hoo Sheau PengJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Tan Wee HaoAttorney-General’s Chambers
Tan YanyingAttorney-General’s Chambers
Balakrishnan ChitraM/s Regency Legal LLP
Lam Wai SengLam WS & Co

4. Facts

  1. The accused was arrested during a CNB raid at Block 21 Chai Chee Road.
  2. The accused volunteered information about two bundles of drugs in a cabinet.
  3. CNB officers found five bundles of drugs containing not less than 21.25g of diamorphine.
  4. The accused initially claimed the drugs were for his own consumption.
  5. The accused later claimed he was merely a courier for Ah Chong.
  6. The accused's DNA was found on the drug packaging.
  7. The accused stated he planned to wait for instructions from Ah Chong to deliver the bundles.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah, Criminal Case No 71 of 2018, [2019] SGHC 71
  2. Muhammad Ridzuan bin Md Ali v Public Prosecutor and other matters, , [2014] 3 SLR 721
  3. Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor and another appeal, , [2018] 2 SLR 119

6. Timeline

DateEvent
CNB officers raided Block 21 Chai Chee Road #07-456 and arrested Lim Koon Eng Jeremiah and Oh Yew Lee.
Accused volunteered information about two bundles in a cabinet.
SSSgt Sunny found and seized two bundles wrapped in newspaper.
Sgt Yogaraj commenced a second search and found three more bundles in a basket.
Accused stated he wanted to try his luck regarding the further three bundles.
Accused provided three contemporaneous statements.
IO Imran recorded one statement from the accused under s 23 of the CPC.
IO Imran recorded one statement from the accused under s 22 of the CPC.
IO Imran recorded one statement from the accused under s 22 of the CPC.
Accused examined by Dr Yeo Chen Kuan Derrick of the IMH.
Accused examined by Dr Yeo Chen Kuan Derrick of the IMH.
Accused examined by Dr Yeo Chen Kuan Derrick of the IMH.
IO Imran recorded one statement from the accused under s 22 of the CPC.
IO Imran recorded one statement from the accused under s 22 of the CPC.
Trial began.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Possession of Controlled Drug for Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court found that the accused possessed the drugs with the intention to traffic them.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Intention to traffic
      • Knowledge of the nature of the drug
    • Related Cases:
      • [2014] 3 SLR 721
      • [2018] 2 SLR 119

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Mandatory Death Sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Drug Trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Muhammad Ridzuan bin Md Ali v Public Prosecutor and other mattersCourt of AppealYes[2014] 3 SLR 721SingaporeCited for the elements of a charge of trafficking under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the MDA.
Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor and another appealUnknownYes[2018] 2 SLR 119SingaporeCited for the requirement to adduce evidence to prove knowing possession of the threshold quantity of drugs stated in s 17 of the MDA to trigger the presumption.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 5(1)(a)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 5(2)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 258(1)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 22Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 23Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 17Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 33(1)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 33B(1)(a)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 33B(2)(a)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 33B(2)(b)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Trafficking
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • CNB
  • Courier
  • Possession
  • Intention
  • Ah Chong
  • Ubat

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug Trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Misuse of Drugs Act

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking