Tan Yu Hang

Tan Yu Hang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and bills of lading act. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conditional Stays	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Time-Bar	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yu Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Yu Hang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Standard Chartered Bank v Maersk Tankers: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Finance(Sep 2022) OCBC v STI ORCHARD: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Financing(May 2022) Batavia EXIMP v Owner of New Breeze: Stay of Proceedings & Time Bar Defence in Arbitration(Oct 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Yu Hang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Yu Hang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	34,000.00	11,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	2 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Standard Chartered Bank v Maersk Tankers: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Finance 26 Sep 2022 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener)Neutral	26 Sep 2022	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener): NeutralWinson Oil Trading Pte Ltd was the intervener in the proceedings.
2	OCBC v STI ORCHARD: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Financing 22 May 2022 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener)Neutral	22 May 2022	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener): Unconditional leave to defend granted to DefendantThe court granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend.
3	Batavia EXIMP v Owner of New Breeze: Stay of Proceedings & Time Bar Defence in Arbitration 26 Oct 2021 Batavia EXIMP & Contracting (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	26 Oct 2021	Batavia EXIMP & Contracting (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of S$29,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Phillips 66 v Owner of Vessel “LUNA”: Bills of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Wrongful Arrest 19 Aug 2021 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “LUNA” (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2021	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “LUNA” (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs order below is reversed in favor of the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Batavia EXIMP v Owner of Vessels: Stay of Proceedings & Time-Bar Waiver in Admiralty Dispute 30 May 2021 Batavia EXIMP & Contracting (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	30 May 2021	Batavia EXIMP & Contracting (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Batavia to pay costs of the appeals fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.