Tang Hui Jing

Tang Hui Jing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and property law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and damages.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Hui Jing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tang Hui Jing has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	AKM v AKN: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Jurisdictional Excess(Jul 2014) Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tang Hui Jing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tang Hui Jing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,719,211.90	573,070.633 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AKM v AKN: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Jurisdictional Excess 30 Jul 2014 AKN (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2014	AKN (Defendant): Applications DismissedThe applications to uphold the arbitration award were dismissed.
2	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Overseas Hotels Limited (Other)Neutral	25 Aug 2010	Overseas Hotels Limited (Other): NeutralWatching brief.
3	Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute 01 Aug 2010 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	01 Aug 2010	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of Singtel in the sum of $1,719,211.90, with interest from the date of writ to date of judgment at 5.33% per annum. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Yickvi Realty v Pacific Rover: Easement Dispute over Road Realignment 17 Sep 2009 Yickvi Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	17 Sep 2009	Yickvi Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Yickvi was not entitled to an injunction to restrain Pacific Rover from realigning the road. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition Clause Dispute 31 May 2009 Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	31 May 2009	Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Sports Connection was successful in its appeal against the High Court's decision. The court also awarded costs of the present appeal as well as three quarters of its costs in the court below. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.