Tang Li Ling Yvonne

Tang Li Ling Yvonne is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trade Mark Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trade Mark Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Li Ling Yvonne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tang Li Ling Yvonne has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Combe International Ltd v Dr August Wolff: Trademark Opposition & VAGISAN Mark(Apr 2022) Digi International Inc v Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd: Trade Mark Registration, Co-existence Agreement & Distinctiveness(Jul 2021) Dr. August Wolff v. Combe: Trade Mark Invalidity & Likelihood of Confusion(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tang Li Ling Yvonne's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tang Li Ling Yvonne's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,500.00	1,875.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Combe International Ltd v Dr August Wolff: Trademark Opposition & VAGISAN Mark 06 Apr 2022 Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Defendant, Respondent)Won	06 Apr 2022	Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantAppeal dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Digi International Inc v Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd: Trade Mark Registration, Co-existence Agreement & Distinctiveness 01 Jul 2021 Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd (Respondent)Won	01 Jul 2021	Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd (Respondent): Cross-Appeal DismissedCross-appeal against the Intellectual Property Adjudicator’s decision was dismissed.
3	Dr. August Wolff v. Combe: Trade Mark Invalidity & Likelihood of Confusion 24 Feb 2021 Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $7,500 (inclusive of disbursements) to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Hai Tong Co v Ventree Singapore: Trade Mark Infringement of 'Lady Rose' Mark 10 May 2012 Hai Tong Co. (Pte) Ltd. (Plaintiff)Won	10 May 2012	Hai Tong Co. (Pte) Ltd. (Plaintiff): Injunction granted to restrain trade mark infringementInjunctions granted to restrain the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiff’s “Lady Rose” mark. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Virtual Map v SLA: Copyright Infringement Appeal - Leave to Appeal Denied 05 Jan 2009 Singapore Land Authority (Respondent, Applicant)Won	05 Jan 2009	Singapore Land Authority (Respondent, Applicant): Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal AllowedApplication to strike out the Notice of Appeal is allowed with costs.