Virtual Map v SLA: Copyright Infringement Appeal - Leave to Appeal Denied

Virtual Map (Singapore) Pte Ltd appealed a High Court decision affirming a District Court ruling that it infringed Singapore Land Authority's (SLA) copyright by reproducing SLA's street directory and address point vector data in its online maps. The Court of Appeal struck out Virtual Map's notice of appeal because it did not obtain leave to appeal as required under s 34(2)(a) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, since the original claim was commenced in the District Court. The court also denied Virtual Map's application for leave to appeal, finding no merit in its arguments.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

SLA’s application to strike out the Notice of Appeal is allowed with costs, and VM’s application for leave to appeal against the Judge’s decision is dismissed with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Intellectual Property

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Court of Appeal denied Virtual Map's application for leave to appeal a copyright infringement decision, finding no grounds for appeal.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Virtual Map (Singapore) Pte LtdAppellant, RespondentCorporationAppeal DismissedLostLow Chai Chong, Mark Jerome Seah, Alvin Lim Jun Hao
Singapore Land AuthorityRespondent, ApplicantStatutory BoardApplication to Strike Out Notice of Appeal AllowedWonDedar Singh Gill, Tang Li Ling Yvonne

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chan Sek KeongChief JusticeNo
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealYes
V K RajahJustice of the Court of AppealNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Low Chai ChongRodyk & Davidson LLP
Mark Jerome SeahRodyk & Davidson LLP
Alvin Lim Jun HaoRodyk & Davidson LLP
Dedar Singh GillDrew & Napier LLC
Tang Li Ling YvonneDrew & Napier LLC

4. Facts

  1. Virtual Map (VM) provides online maps and related services.
  2. Singapore Land Authority (SLA) sued VM for copyright infringement.
  3. SLA and VM were previously parties to licensing agreements.
  4. SLA terminated the licensing agreements.
  5. SLA claimed VM's online maps reproduced SLA's copyrighted works.
  6. The District Court found VM had infringed SLA's copyright.
  7. The High Court affirmed the District Court's decision.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Virtual Map (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Singapore Land Authority, OS 561/2008, CA 55/2008, SUM 2056/2008, [2009] SGCA 2

6. Timeline

DateEvent
SLA gave VM 30 days’ notice to terminate the licence agreements.
The licence agreements came to an end.
SLA demanded that VM cease using materials that contained reproductions of SLA’s works.
Copyright suit commenced in the District Court.
District Court found VM liable for copyright infringement.
High Court affirmed the District Court's decision and dismissed VM’s appeal.
VM applied to the Judge for leave to appeal.
The Judge dismissed VM's application for leave to appeal.
VM filed a notice of appeal against the Judge’s decision.
SLA applied to strike out the Notice of Appeal.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Leave to Appeal
    • Outcome: The court held that leave to appeal was required and denied the application for leave.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interpretation of s 34(2)(a) Supreme Court of Judicature Act
      • Amount or value of subject matter at trial
      • Grant of leave to appeal
  2. Copyright Infringement
    • Outcome: The court upheld the lower court's finding of copyright infringement.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Copying of maps
      • Street directory vector data
      • Address point vector data
      • Nature of copying
      • Altered copying
      • Test of substantiality for altered copying
  3. Right to Appeal
    • Outcome: The court clarified the application of s 34(2)(a) and the principle of one tier of appeal as of right.
    • Category: Jurisdictional
    • Sub-Issues:
      • One tier of appeal as of right for civil cases
      • Legislative intention of s 34(2)(a) Supreme Court of Judicature Act
      • Application of s 34(2)(a) to claims commenced in the High Court

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Injunction
  2. Delivery up and/or destruction of infringing materials
  3. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Copyright Infringement

10. Practice Areas

  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Technology
  • Mapping
  • Online Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Singapore Land Authority v Virtual Map (Singapore) Pte LtdDistrict CourtYes[2007] SGDC 216SingaporeAffirmed by the High Court; sets out the detailed facts and the District Court's findings of copyright infringement.
Virtual Map (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Singapore Land AuthorityHigh CourtYes[2008] 3 SLR 86SingaporeAffirmed the District Court's decision on copyright infringement; central to the appeal.
Tan Chiang Brother’s Marble (S) Pte Ltd v Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings LtdCourt of AppealYes[2002] 2 SLR 225SingaporeInterpreted s 34(2)(a) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act regarding the amount or value of the subject-matter at trial.
Teo Eng Chuan v Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay (No 2)Court of AppealYes[2003] 4 SLR 442SingaporeReiterated the interpretation of s 34(2)(a) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act and clarified its scope.
Abdul Rahman bin Shariff v Abdul Salim bin SyedCourt of AppealYes[1999] 4 SLR 716SingaporeClarified that the amount in dispute does not include non-contractual interest and costs.
Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Yong Qiang ConstructionCourt of AppealYes[1999] 4 SLR 401SingaporeDefined 'trial' to include any judicial hearing.
Hailisen Shipping Co Ltd v Pan-United Shipyard Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2004] 1 SLR 148SingaporeAddressed whether leave to appeal is required when no monetary value can be placed on the subject matter; distinguished in the present case.
Virtual Map (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Suncool International Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2005] 2 SLR 157SingaporeReferenced regarding the amount VM spent developing its maps, but no evidence was adduced.
Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian s/o Rangasamy (No 2)High CourtYes[2004] 3 SLR 193SingaporeCited regarding the penalty in costs for a plaintiff who unreasonably inflates his claim.
Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang HongCourt of AppealYes[1997] 3 SLR 489SingaporeEstablished the three limbs for granting leave to appeal.
IW v IXCourt of AppealYes[2006] 1 SLR 135SingaporeReaffirmed the three limbs for granting leave to appeal.
Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) LtdHouse of LordsYes[2000] 1 WLR 2416United KingdomDiscussed the test of substantiality in cases of 'altered copying'.
Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) LtdUnknownYes[1964] 1 WLR 273UnknownCited in the District Court decision as an example of normal copying.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Section 34(2)(a) Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed)Singapore
Copyright Act (Cap 63, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Subordinate Courts Act (Cap 321, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore
Trade Marks Act (Cap 332, 2005 Rev Ed)Singapore
High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 123, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Copyright infringement
  • Street directory vector data
  • Address point vector data
  • Licence agreements
  • Leave to appeal
  • Substantial reproduction
  • Altered copying
  • Fingerprints of copying
  • GPS survey
  • Section 34(2)(a) Supreme Court of Judicature Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Copyright
  • Infringement
  • Appeal
  • Leave to appeal
  • Virtual Map
  • Singapore Land Authority
  • Mapping data

16. Subjects

  • Copyright
  • Civil Procedure
  • Appeals
  • Jurisdiction

17. Areas of Law

  • Copyright Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Appeals
  • Courts and Jurisdiction