Tay Jing En

Tay Jing En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and construction law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Jing En has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Variations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Back charges	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rectification Works	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts procured by bribery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Jing En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Jing En has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mallal & Namazie	3 cases	100% of cases	Vim Engineering v Deluge Fire Protection: Construction Contract Dispute over Variation Works and Back-Charges(Jan 2023) Indian Bank v Green Mint Pte Ltd: Illegality & Public Policy in Loan Contracts Procured by Bribery(Nov 2021) VQB v VQC: Divorce Based on Separation, Setting Aside Judgments(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Jing En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Jing En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	41,788.80	20,894.402 cases	2
USD	546,920.78	546,920.781 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vim Engineering v Deluge Fire Protection: Construction Contract Dispute over Variation Works and Back-Charges 11 Jan 2023 Deluge Fire Protection (S.E.A.) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	11 Jan 2023	Deluge Fire Protection (S.E.A.) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Counterclaim Partially AllowedCounterclaim partially allowed; back-charges awarded in the amount of $41,788.80 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Indian Bank v Green Mint Pte Ltd: Illegality & Public Policy in Loan Contracts Procured by Bribery 24 Nov 2021 Indian Bank (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Won	24 Nov 2021	Indian Bank (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and judgment given to the bank in the sum of US$546,920.78.
3	VQB v VQC: Divorce Based on Separation, Setting Aside Judgments 15 Mar 2021 VQB (Appellant)Lost	15 Mar 2021	VQB (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.