Tee Su Mien

Tee Su Mien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tee Su Mien has demonstrated expertise across 72 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Existence of arbitration agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts of indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sufficiency of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bars to rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitutionary Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescue financing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Super priority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitrability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Validity of arbitral award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Separability Doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tee Su Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tee Su Mien has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	7 cases	78% of cases	ST Group Co Ltd v Sanum Investments: Enforcement of Arbitration Award & Scope of Arbitration Agreement(Nov 2019) BXY v BXX: Dispute Over Tribunal Jurisdiction in SIAC Arbitration(Jul 2019) PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore: Breach of Contract & Coal Supply Obligations in Joint Venture(Aug 2018)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	22% of cases	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages(Jan 2019) BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tee Su Mien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 6 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.2 parties avg	4.2	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Partial	24.5 parties avg	4.5	22%
Won	45.1 parties avg	5.1	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2018	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	35.1 parties avg	5.1

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tee Su Mien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(30%)	30%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Won	4(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ST Group Co Ltd v Sanum Investments: Enforcement of Arbitration Award & Scope of Arbitration Agreement 17 Nov 2019 ST Vegas Co Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Nov 2019	ST Vegas Co Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Leave Order granted to Sanum Investments Limited set aside.
2	BXY v BXX: Dispute Over Tribunal Jurisdiction in SIAC Arbitration 18 Jul 2019 BYC (Defendant)Won	18 Jul 2019	BYC (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application to reverse the tribunal's ruling was dismissed.
3	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages 08 Jan 2019 Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jan 2019	Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff): Financial ability to fund KSC establishedThe court found that BCBCS had the financial ability to fund KSC until the completion of commissioning and testing at the Tabang Plant or until June 2012.
4	PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore: Breach of Contract & Coal Supply Obligations in Joint Venture 28 Aug 2018 Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	28 Aug 2018	Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; the question of whether BCBCS had the ability to fund KSC on its own is remitted to the Court for determination.
5	Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 17 Jun 2018 ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Jun 2018	ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant): WonSummons allowed for S.T. Vegas Enterprise Ltd.
6	Re Attilan Group Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement, Rescue Financing & Super Priority 07 Nov 2017 Six individual creditors (Respondent)Neutral	07 Nov 2017	Six individual creditors (Respondent): Creditors' meeting allowedThe court allowed the creditors' meeting to proceed.
7	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project 24 Jul 2017 Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jul 2017	Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	AYK v AYM: Mareva Injunction Granted in Aid of Arbitration Enforcement 28 Dec 2015 AYM (Defendant)Lost	28 Dec 2015	AYM (Defendant): Injunction granted against the defendantThe court issued a worldwide injunction order against the defendant.
9	AYH v AYI: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Exceeding Submission Scope 22 Nov 2015 AYH (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	22 Nov 2015	AYH (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.