Teo Choo Kee

Teo Choo Kee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Self Defence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Safety	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Choo Kee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Choo Kee has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CK Teo & Co	3 cases	43% of cases	Tan Sen Yang v. Public Prosecutor: Murder, Sudden Fight, and Diminished Responsibility at Orchard Towers(Aug 2024) Tan Bee Hock v F G Builders: Negligence Claim for Motorcycle Accident on Metal Plates(Mar 2016) PP v Tan Chee Wee: Murder, Self-Defense & Sudden Fight in Robbery(Oct 2003)
Lee & Tan	2 cases	29% of cases	Chow Mun Fai v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Possession of Diamorphine(Mar 2001) Public Prosecutor v Tan Tiew Guay & Chow Mun Fai: Drug Trafficking & Possession(Nov 2000)
CK Teo and Co	2 cases	29% of cases	Chew Seow Leng v PP: Drug Trafficking, Chain of Custody, Mandatory Death Penalty under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2005) Tan Chee Wee v PP: Murder Conviction Affirmed - Sudden Fight Exception & Mens Rea(Jan 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Choo Kee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Choo Kee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Sen Yang v. Public Prosecutor: Murder, Sudden Fight, and Diminished Responsibility at Orchard Towers 07 Aug 2024 Tan Sen Yang (Defendant)Lost	07 Aug 2024	Tan Sen Yang (Defendant): ConvictionConvicted of murder under section 300(c) of the Penal Code; sentenced to life imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
2	Tan Bee Hock v F G Builders: Negligence Claim for Motorcycle Accident on Metal Plates 15 Mar 2016 Tan Bee Hock (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Mar 2016	Tan Bee Hock (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chew Seow Leng v PP: Drug Trafficking, Chain of Custody, Mandatory Death Penalty under Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Mar 2005 Chew Seow Leng (Appellant)Lost	06 Mar 2005	Chew Seow Leng (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
4	Tan Chee Wee v PP: Murder Conviction Affirmed - Sudden Fight Exception & Mens Rea 09 Jan 2004 Tan Chee Wee (Appellant)Lost	09 Jan 2004	Tan Chee Wee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction of murder was dismissed, and the sentence of death was affirmed.
5	PP v Tan Chee Wee: Murder, Self-Defense & Sudden Fight in Robbery 01 Oct 2003 Tan Chee Wee (Accused)Lost	01 Oct 2003	Tan Chee Wee (Accused): Accused ConvictedAccused convicted of murder and sentenced to death (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Chow Mun Fai v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Possession of Diamorphine 26 Mar 2001 Chow Mun Fai (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2001	Chow Mun Fai (Appellant): Appeal dismissedChow Mun Fai's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
7	Public Prosecutor v Tan Tiew Guay & Chow Mun Fai: Drug Trafficking & Possession 28 Nov 2000 Chow Mun Fai (Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2000	Chow Mun Fai (Defendant): Guilty of TraffickingFound guilty of possession of 23.21g of heroin for the purposes of trafficking and sentenced to death.